House debates
Wednesday, 15 February 2006
Questions to the Speaker
Therapeutic Goods Amendment (Repeal of Ministerial responsibility for approval of RU486) Bill 2005
3:42 pm
Kim Beazley (Brand, Australian Labor Party, Leader of the Opposition) Share this | Hansard source
That is the member for Lindsay’s clarification, but that is not what the member for Mackellar was seeking. It is clear cut, Mr Speaker, and she deserves a clear-cut answer. It is possible for a person to remove from the chamber any amendment that they have moved in their name. They can withdraw that amendment if they want to. That is point 1. Point 2 is this: it is possible to amend the legislation in the way in which has been suggested by a foreshadowed bill in consideration in detail, which answers the second part of the member for Mackellar’s question. That is possible too. That course of action is open. If the member for Lindsay does not want to take that course of action, that is fine. But the member for Mackellar is entitled to a straight answer on it.
No comments