House debates
Wednesday, 15 February 2006
Questions to the Speaker
Therapeutic Goods Amendment (Repeal of Ministerial responsibility for approval of RU486) Bill 2005
3:42 pm
Lindsay Tanner (Melbourne, Australian Labor Party, Shadow Minister for Finance) Share this | Hansard source
I am sorry, Mr Speaker, I did not understand your response. If another member, whether with respect to this bill or another bill, decides to move in consideration in detail an amendment that arguably reflects a sentiment that was contained in a second reading amendment that has been negatived, would that member be precluded from doing so? Would they be out of order in doing so?
No comments