Debate resumed from 5 September, on motion by Ms Julie Bishop:

That this bill be now read a second time.

upon which Ms Macklin moved by way of amendment:

That all words after “That” be omitted with a view to substituting the following words: “whilst not declining to give the bill a second reading, the House condemns the Government for:

(1)

its extreme and arrogant imposition of a nuclear waste dump on the Northern Territory;

(2)

breaking a specific promise made before the last election to not locate a waste dump in the Northern Territory;

(3)

its heavy-handed disregard for the legal and other rights of Northern Territorians and other communities, by overriding any existing or future State or Territory law or regulation that prohibits or interferes with the selection of Commonwealth land as a site, the establishment of a waste dump, and the transportation of waste across Australia;

(4)

destroying any recourse to procedural fairness provisions for anyone wishing to challenge the Minister’s decision to impose a waste dump on the Northern Territory;

(5)

establishing a hand-picked committee of inquiry into the economics of nuclear power in Australia, while disregarding the economic case for all alternatives sources of energy; and

(6)

keeping secret all plans for the siting of nuclear power stations and related nuclear waste dumps”.

See this item in context