House debates

Wednesday, 29 November 2006

Migration Amendment (Employer Sanctions) Bill 2006

Second Reading

6:46 pm

Photo of Andrew RobbAndrew Robb (Goldstein, Liberal Party, Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs) Share this | Hansard source

I present the explanatory memorandum and move:

That this bill be now read a second time.

The Migration Amendment (Employer Sanctions) Bill 2006 sets out a scheme of sanctions on employers and labour suppliers who knowingly or recklessly engage illegal workers.

The government has long had concerns about those who seek to work illegally in Australia.

Our current estimate is that there are around 46,000 visa overstayers in Australia. We believe that a substantial proportion of these people are working illegally to support their stay here.

In addition, a small proportion of the millions of other temporary entrants to Australia each year may work illegally during their stay.

The traditional approach to dealing with the problem of illegal workers in Australia continues to be quite successful.

This approach includes highly effective visa processing arrangements for overseas visitors, students and other temporary residents.

These arrangements prevent the majority of potential illegal workers from entering Australia in the first place.

In other words, unlike many other countries, we deal with most of the problem before it actually becomes a problem.

However, no matter how good Australia’s visa arrangements are, there will still be some people who seek to take advantage of our desire to attract genuine visitors, students and other temporary residents.

This requires the government to allocate significant resources towards locating and removing illegal workers and overstayers.

In the 2005-06 program year there were over 10,000 locations of persons who had overstayed or otherwise breached their visa conditions.

Many of these people were also working illegally in Australia.

The government believes that illegal work causes a number of problems for the Australian community.

First, it takes job opportunities away from Australian citizens and lawful migrants.

Second, the cost of detecting illegal workers is an unwelcome burden on the taxpayer.

Finally, in some cases illegal work is linked to organised crime, particularly in the sex industry.

The government is particularly concerned about circumstances in which women may be trafficked into Australia to work illegally in conditions of sexual servitude, forced labour or slavery.

Despite the recent success of our immigration compliance activities, the government believes that the further statutory reforms contained in this bill are required.

The government’s immigration compliance strategy has been designed on the basis of voluntary compliance.

The government believes that there needs to be provision for imposing sanctions on the small number of employers and labour suppliers who deliberately engage or refer noncitizens without the right to work in Australia.

This bill introduces the required fault-based criminal offences.

The proposed offences will only apply where the employer or labour supplier knew the person was an illegal worker, or was reckless to that fact.

Framing the offences in this way ensures that they can be focused on the employers and labour suppliers of concern to the government, without imposing any additional burden on business generally.

For example an employer will only be ‘reckless’ if there was a ‘substantial risk’ that the employee was an illegal worker.

Recklessness might be proved in a prosecution where a number of basic conditions are satisfied.

It would be easier to prove where the employer operates in an industry where there are relatively high proportions of illegal workers.

These include the construction, hospitality, cleaning, taxi and sex industries.

Another element that might go to proving recklessness is where the employer in question has previously been warned about employing illegal workers and has been given guidance on how to check work rights.

A further element could be that the job applicant says something that indicates they may not be entitled to work—for example, that they are only visiting Australia.

The bill also deals with the various employment-like relationships that feature in illegal work in Australia.

The concept of ‘allowing’ an illegal worker to work is broadly defined to capture work relationships that are commonly used in industries where illegal workers are found.

The government is very concerned that those involved in illegal work in the sex industry should not be able to hide behind devices designed solely to distance themselves from their employees.

That is why this bill includes specific provisions for situations where ‘landlords’ rent premises, intending those premises to be used to provide sexual services.

A feature of the bill is the much higher penalties for offences where aggravating circumstances are present, such as where the illegal worker is in a condition of sexual servitude, forced labour or slavery.

The trafficking of people, particularly women and children, to work under these conditions is a despicable crime.

The government is determined to deal with anyone who knowingly participates in this kind of criminal activity.

This includes employers who may be willing to take advantage of the victims of sexual servitude, forced labour or slavery.

Finally, the offences in this bill will also play a role in preventing some malpractice associated with the 457 visa. For example, where an employer moves a 457 visa holder into a low-skilled or semi-skilled position, the offence in section 245AC of allowing a noncitizen to work in breach of their visa conditions may be committed.

In summary, this bill deals with some very serious issues in Australian society, but does so with an eye to ensuring that only those employers and labour suppliers who are of genuine concern will be affected by the offences.

The bill is the product of a long period of consultation and development and deserves the support of all members of this parliament.

I commend the bill to the House.

Comments

No comments