Ian Causley (Page, Deputy-Speaker) Share this | Hansard source

On behalf of the Joint Standing Committee on the National Capital and External Territories, I present the committee’s report entitled Review of the Griffin Legacy amendments.

Ordered that the report be made a parliamentary paper.

by leave—On behalf of the Joint Standing Committee on the National Capital and External Territories, I have the pleasure of presenting our report entitled, Review of the Griffin Legacy amendments. The Griffin Legacy amendments are some of the most significant changes proposed for the future urban planning of Canberra. They seek to restate some of the key planning principles Griffin proposed and articulate specific strategic plans for the central national area. The amendments examined by the committee include amendment 56, the Griffin Legacy—principles and policies; amendment 59, City Hill precinct; amendment 60, Constitution Avenue; and amendment 61, West Basin.

The committee supports the broad aims of the Griffin Legacy project. The aim of advancing Griffin’s plan to guide the future urban planning of Canberra through the 21st century is enviable. The committee, however, believes that the Griffin Legacy amendments can be improved. Through the roundtable public hearing, evidence was provided which questioned the adequacy of parts of these amendments. These criticisms are not easily dismissed.

In relation to amendment 56, concerns were raised about excessive building height, traffic and transport implications, loss of vistas of national significance and loss of green space. In addition, there were concerns about the scale of the proposed developments and the lack of a rigorous planning rationale. At the same time, the committee’s examination revealed that there were concerns about the adequacy of the NCA’s consultation process. The examination of amendment 59 revealed concerns about the level of detail, issues about public funding, specific concerns about serious disruptions to traffic and excess building heights and loss of vistas.

Amendment 60 notes that Constitution Avenue will become an elegant and vibrant mixed use grand boulevard linking London Circuit to Russell. The amendment was supported by key stakeholders including, for example, the Returned and Services League of Australia, the Canberra Institute of Technology and St John’s Church. Each of these groups has made valid cases for supporting the amendment. The committee, however, has noted some of the concerns about the amendment which also cannot be easily dismissed—in particular, the scale of the proposal and the possible negative impact on the vista from Parliament House towards Constitution Avenue, which is perhaps one of the most significant urban vistas in the nation.

Amendment 61, West Basin, is notable for its size and scope. It is proposed that part of the lake be reclaimed using infill taken from the proposed Parkes Way and Kings Avenue tunnel. The amendment provides for a land bridge over a section of Parkes Way for streets to extend to the lake. A waterfront promenade will be created, and stepped back from that will be a series of buildings. Building height on the waterfront promenade will be limited to eight metres, a maximum of two storeys. The parapet height of buildings fronting the promenade will be a maximum of 16 metres, and taller building elements a maximum of 25 metres and not exceeding 30 per cent of the site area may be considered. Taller buildings may be considered on sites north of Parkes Way.

In considering this matter further, the committee examined the NCA’s 2004 report, The Griffin Legacy, Canberrathe nation’s capital in the 21st century. In that report, the NCA set out a plan for West Basin which is moderate in tone, less dominated by development and much more inclusive through the use of extensive green areas. Evidence to the committee suggested that the scale of development for West Basin should configure more closely to the NCA’s 2004 proposal. As a result of the committee’s findings, the committee has recommended that amendments 56, 59, 60 and 61 be disallowed so that the NCA has the opportunity to further refine the amendments, taking into account issues raised in the committee’s report. This finetuning is necessary and in the interests of Canberra and the nation.

I would like to express, on behalf of the committee, our gratitude to all those who participated in the inquiry and to the staff of the secretariat. I thank my committee colleagues for their cooperation and substantial contribution throughout the course of the inquiry. On behalf of the committee, I commend the report to the House.

See this speech in context