Harry Jenkins (Speaker) Share this | Hansard source

Yesterday the member for Hume raised a matter of privilege concerning comments reported to have been made about him by the New South Wales National Party leader, Mr Andrew Stoner. The member claimed that the words used by Mr Stoner represented a threat against him and an attempt to interfere with his ability to perform his duties as a member. Any attempt to threaten a member with a view to influencing the member’s performance of his or her duties as a member is a serious matter and can be punished as a contempt if it is found to constitute improper interference.

I have examined the media articles in relation to the member for Hume’s complaint. It is clear that the words reportedly used by the Leader of the Nationals in New South Wales are undesirable. In the political environment, however, it is not unknown for members and other participants to employ hyperbole and to use exaggerated or colourful language when making a point. Many such comments are not intended to be taken literally.

Having regard to the political context in which the comments were made and to the desire over many years now that the House’s power with respect to matters of contempt should be used sparingly, I am of the opinion that precedence should not be given to emotion on this occasion. I note that the member for Hume has also taken the opportunity, through the media, to respond to Mr Stoner.

See this speech in context