Kevin Rudd (Griffith, Australian Labor Party, Prime Minister) Share this | Hansard source

As I said in response to an earlier question, the government’s policy, like that of those opposite, is to have a budget surplus across the economic cycle. Therefore it is a question of the length of the economic cycle. We are in unprecedented territory at the moment because of the global financial crisis. Therefore, under those circumstances, while I have said to the House that under current circumstances the government does not see the need to embark upon that course of action, if the global financial crisis worsens and if we need, therefore, to defend jobs, families and the economy in the national interest, then a temporary budget deficit would be acceptable under those circumstances.

I would say to those opposite, as they seek again to extract political mileage out of this because they are not concerned about defending jobs—they are not, because they are not interested in answers on this—that we have a strategy to see Australia through this crisis. Those opposite simply have a series of political cliches. As a jobs impact flows to Australian families, I would strongly suggest to those opposite that they pay close attention to the real answers that mums and dads of families across Australia will want. Mums and dads of families wanted decisive action on the question of their bank guarantees. This government delivered it.

See this speech in context