Robert McClelland (Barton, Australian Labor Party, Attorney-General) Share this | Hansard source

by leave—There is no greater responsibility of any government than to protect the safety and security of its citizens. As the events of recent weeks demonstrate, terrorism continues to pose a real and significant threat to Australia and Australian interests both here and abroad.

The Australian government is committed to ensuring the focus of Australia’s national security and counterterrorism laws remains on preventing a terrorist attack from occurring in the first place—not just waiting to punish those who would commit these heinous crimes after they occur. An effective legal framework is therefore fundamental to our ability to address Australia’s security environment. To that end, I am today announcing the release of a comprehensive discussion paper detailing the government’s proposed reforms to Australia’s national security and counterterrorism legislation.

The amendments proposed in this discussion paper seek to achieve an appropriate balance between the government’s responsibility to protect Australia, its people and its interests and to instil confidence that our laws will be exercised in a just and accountable way.

In December 2008, I announced and tabled our response to a number of outstanding reviews of national security and counterterrorism legislation, including:

• The Clarke inquiry into the Dr Mohamed Haneef case;
• The Parliamentary Joint Committee on Intelligence and Security report, Review of security and counter terrorism legislation;
• The Parliamentary Joint Committee on Intelligence and Security report, Inquiry into the proscription of ‘terrorist organisations’ under the Australian Criminal Code; and
• The Australian Law Reform Commission’s review of Australia’s sedition laws.

At the time, the government stated that it supported the majority of recommendations made by each of these reviews, which largely dealt with the need to provide clarification and in some cases additional safeguards in relation to the exercise of law enforcement and investigatory powers. In addition, the government also committed to publicly release draft legislation implementing the government’s response to these reviews.

While I will not attempt to outline in detail all the measures contained in a very detailed discussion paper, there are a number of key measures that are proposed. They include:

• expanding the definition of a ‘terrorist act’ in the Criminal Code to include psychological, as well as physical harm;
• providing police with new emergency powers to enter and search premises without a warrant where it is suspected, on reasonable grounds, that there is material relevant to a terrorist offence and there is a real and substantial threat to public health and safety;
• extending the time available for police to re-enter a premises under a search warrant from one hour to 12 hours in circumstances where they have been unable to enter or been required to evacuate due to emergency circumstances;
• introducing a new terrorism hoax offence, punishable by up to 10 years imprisonment, for those that seek to create a false belief that a terrorist act is occurring, or will likely occur;
• establishing a maximum seven-day limit on the amount of time that can be specified by a magistrate and disregarded from the investigation period in relation to an alleged terrorism offence;
• inserting a right of appeal for both the prosecution and the defendant against bail decisions in terrorism and national security matters, including the power to stay a bail order where an appeal is planned;
• creating an offence of inciting violence against an individual on the basis of race, religion, nationality, national origin or political opinion to supplement the existing Commonwealth offence of inciting violence against a group;
• extending the expiration period of regulations proscribing a terrorist organisation from two to three years;
• amending the National Security Information (Criminal and Civil Proceedings) Act 2004 so that national security and counterterrorism court proceedings may be expedited;
• establishing a Parliamentary Joint Committee on Law Enforcement to extend parliamentary oversight to include the Australian Federal Police in addition to the current brief of examining the Australian Crime Commission; and
• renaming the offence of sedition to ‘urging violence’ and expanding its provisions to include urging force or violence against an individual, not just a group, and including national origin, as well as race, religion, nationality or political opinion as a reason for urging violence.

The government has endeavoured to address the concerns and issues raised by recent important reviews of national security and counterterrorism legislation. I note in respect of the Parliamentary Joint Committee on ASIO, ASIS and the DSD, the reviews occurred at the time when those in opposition had the majority of the members on those committees, but the work was sound and the members were people of integrity and they have made balanced and sound recommendations. These responses, we believe, will achieve the right balance between strong laws that protect our safety while preserving the democratic rights that protect our freedoms.

The proposed package of reforms represents a significant step to achieve just that. The government’s efforts in this area, however, do not start and finish with the proposed reforms contained in the paper. We heard in question time today from the Minister for Home Affairs of the measures he is taking in the areas of electronic security and the areas of money laundering and preventing the financing of terrorist organisations.

In addition, my colleague the Special Minister of State, Joseph Ludwig, has already introduced legislation to establish a national security legislation monitor to review the practical operation, effectiveness and implications of national security and counterterrorism legislation and that will be done on an annual basis. The monitor will be independent and will consider whether legislation adequately protects public safety, without reducing cherished public freedoms.

The government has also extended the mandate of the Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security to cover agencies such as the Australian Federal Police and progressed recommendations arising out of the Street review enabling greater interoperability between our law enforcement and intelligence agencies. Indeed, the recent joint operation witnessed last week in Melbourne is testimony to the enhanced cooperation between intelligence and law enforcement agencies at the Commonwealth, state and territory levels.

In addition, the government is also:

• completing its first counterterrorism white paper;
• developing strategies to counter violent extremism;
• implementing recommendations of a key e-security review to address the growth in sophisticated online attacks; and
• more generally, ensuring our national security strategy encompasses an all-hazards approach in both man-made and natural events.

Each and all of the measures I have outlined today are designed to give the Australian community confidence that our law enforcement and security agencies have the tools they need to fight terrorism, while ensuring these laws and powers are balanced by appropriate safeguards and are fully accountable in their operation. As the Prime Minister stated in his National Security Statement last year, maintaining this balance is an ongoing challenge for all modern democracies in preparing for the complex national security challenges of the future. By striking this balance, the Australian community can have confidence in our national security framework.

The government remains committed to developing legislation in a careful and consultative manner and, with that in mind, has already provided the proposed amendments to state and territory governments for their consideration. The discussion paper provides key stakeholders and the Australian public generally with the opportunity to participate in the process of amending Australia’s national security and counterterrorism laws. I table a copy of the report, titled National Security legislation: discussion paper on proposed amendments, and I can indicate also that that discussion paper will be available on the website of the Attorney-General’s Department. The government is committed to developing these laws in a transparent and accountable way. The discussion paper will be open for public comment until 25 September 2009. Engagement with and support from the community is essential to that process being worth while. I certainly look forward to receiving submissions from those in this place and from the community more widely on these important reforms to our national security legislation.

I ask leave of the House to move a motion to enable the member for Farrer to speak for 10 minutes.

Leave granted.

I move:

That so much of the standing and sessional orders be suspended as would prevent Ms Ley speaking in reply to the ministerial statement for a period not exceeding 10 minutes.

Question agreed to.

See this speech in context