Christopher Pyne (Sturt, Liberal Party, Leader of the House) Share this | Hansard source

Why, if the $225,000 payment by Winslow construction to the AWU was legitimate—a different payment—was it concealed as safety training? Why was it concealed as safety training? If it was a legitimate payment, why was it covered up by the AWU when the Leader of the Opposition was the Victorian state secretary? What did the Leader of the Opposition have to gain by trading away the penalty rates of Cleanevent workers?

Mr Burke interjecting—

See this speech in context