House debates
Tuesday, 2 February 2016
Motions
Prime Minister
12:04 pm
Bill Shorten (Maribyrnong, Australian Labor Party, Leader of the Opposition) Share this | Hansard source
I seek leave to move the following motion:
That so much of the standing and sessional orders be suspended as would prevent the Member for Maribyrnong from moving the following motion forthwith—That the House:
(1) notes that on:
(a) 22 February 2010, on Q & A, the now Prime Minister said "My view is the market-based mechanism, the emissions trading scheme, is the most cost effective";
(b) 3 June 2010, on Sunrise, the now Prime Minister said "The Coalition does not have the best climate change policy, in my view";
(c) 8 February 2010, during a speech to the House of Representatives, the now Prime Minister said "Having the government pick projects for subsidy is a recipe for fiscal recklessness on a grand scale"
(d) 15 September 2015, on the PM program, the now Prime Minister said about marriage equality "I certainly think we should have a free vote and I’ve been very public about that"; and
(e) 7 November 1999, on Meet the Press, the now Prime Minister said about a republic "It needs a Prime Minister and a Leader of the Opposition working together to promote a Yes vote"; and
(2) affirms that:
(a) an emissions trading scheme is the most cost effective way to combat climate change;
(b) the Coalition does not have the best climate change policy;
(c) having the Government pick projects for subsidy is a recipe for fiscal recklessness on a grand scale;
(d) the Parliament should have a free vote on marriage equality; and
(e) a republic needs a Prime Minister and a Leader of the Opposition working together to promote a Yes vote.
Leave not granted.
I move:
That so much of the standing and sessional orders be suspended as would prevent the Member for Maribyrnong from moving the following motion forthwith—That the House:
(1) notes that on:
(a) 22 February 2010, on Q & A, the now Prime Minister said "My view is the market-based mechanism, the emissions trading scheme, is the most cost effective";
(b) 3 June 2010, on Sunrise, the now Prime Minister said "The Coalition does not have the best climate change policy, in my view";
(c) 8 February 2010, during a speech to the House of Representatives, the now Prime Minister said "Having the government pick projects for subsidy is a recipe for fiscal recklessness on a grand scale"
(d) 15 September 2015, on the PM program, the now Prime Minister said about marriage equality "I certainly think we should have a free vote and I’ve been very public about that"; and
(e) 7 November 1999, on Meet the Press, the now Prime Minister said about a republic "It needs a Prime Minister and a Leader of the Opposition working together to promote a Yes vote"; and
(2) affirms that:
(a) an emissions trading scheme is the most cost effective way to combat climate change;
(b) the Coalition does not have the best climate change policy;
(c) having the Government pick projects for subsidy is a recipe for fiscal recklessness on a grand scale;
(d) the Parliament should have a free vote on marriage equality; and
(e) a republic needs a Prime Minister and a Leader of the Opposition working together to promote a Yes vote.
Malcolm Turnbull has sold out everything he has ever believed in—
No comments