Ross Vasta (Bonner, Liberal Party) Share this | Hansard source

The original question was that this bill be now read a second time. To this the honourable member for McMahon has moved as an amendment that all words after ‘That’ be omitted with a view to substituting other words. If it suits the House, I will state the question in the form that the amendment be agreed to. The question now is that the amendment be agreed to.

I also understand it is the wish of the House to debate this order of the day concurrently with the Treasury Laws Amendment (Major Bank Levy) Bill 2017. As there is no objection, the chair will allow that course to be followed. The question now is that the amendment be agreed to.

See this speech in context