House debates
Thursday, 27 February 2020
Motions
Prime Minister
9:31 am
Ms Catherine King (Ballarat, Australian Labor Party, Shadow Minister for Infrastructure, Transport and Regional Development) Share this | Hansard source
I seek leave to move the following motion:
That the House:
(1) notes the Prime Minister:
(a) has taken his rorts to the streets, allocating more than 83 percent of the $3 billion Urban Congestion Fund to Liberal seats and marginal seats targeted by the Liberal Party;
(b) allocated funding to every Liberal seat that was marginal or under threat, as well as several marginal regional electorates held or targeted by the Liberal Party;
(c) did not allocate a cent to address congestion in 38 urban and regional city seats held by non-Government Members;
(d) incorrectly claimed the projects were election commitments, when the Urban Congestion Fund was established in the 2018 Budget;
(e) did not release any guidelines, did not formally call for expressions of interest, did not spend a cent from the Urban Congestion Fund in 2018-19, but did spend $17 million of government resources on pre-election advertisements telling us how good it was; and
(f) repeatedly sought to downplay and dismiss the serious allegation that his government continually spends taxpayer dollars for private political gain; and
(2) therefore calls on the Prime Minister to:
(a) correct his incorrect statement that Urban Congestion Fund projects are election commitments; and
(b) explain why his Government used taxpayer money as though it was its own personal marketing fund.
Leave not granted.
I move:
That so much of standing orders be suspended as would prevent the member for Ballarat from moving the following motion immediately:
That the House:
(1) notes the Prime Minister:
(a) has taken his rorts to the streets, allocating more than 83 percent of the $3 billion Urban Congestion Fund to Liberal seats and marginal seats targeted by the Liberal Party;
(b) allocated funding to every Liberal seat that was marginal or under threat, as well as several marginal regional electorates held or targeted by the Liberal Party;
(c) did not allocate a cent to address congestion in 38 urban and regional city seats held by non-Government Members;
(d) incorrectly claimed the projects were election commitments, when the Urban Congestion Fund was established in the 2018 Budget;
(e) did not release any guidelines, did not formally call for expressions of interest, did not spend a cent from the Urban Congestion Fund in 2018-19, but did spend $17 million of government resources on pre-election advertisements telling us how good it was; and
(f) repeatedly sought to downplay and dismiss the serious allegation that his government continually spends taxpayer dollars for private political gain; and
(2) therefore calls on the Prime Minister to:
(a) correct his incorrect statement that Urban Congestion Fund projects are election commitments; and
(b) explain why his Government used taxpayer money as though it was its own personal marketing fund.
There is not a program that this government will not rort for its own political—
No comments