Andrew Laming (Bowman, Liberal Party) Share this | Hansard source

Over the last six months, I've been misrepresented by opposition members—and apologies for doing this as a batch. On 11 May, the member for Watson said that I was 'not fit to it be a member of the House' and referred to my vote as being 'tainted' because I was 'trolling and abusing' constituents.

On 12 May, Senator McAllister extensively quoted political opponents, without any substantiation or formal complaint to answer, either then or now.

On 13 May, the member for Dunkley referred to me as 'disgraced and disgraceful', with neither substantiation nor a single complaint to answer.

On 27 May the member for Jagajaga referred to 'inappropriate behaviour', again without any substantiated material.

On 16 June Senator Walsh referred to me as a 'known miscreant' who 'harasses the women in his community' and then the following day stated I have 'a history of trolling and abusing' constituents on Facebook.

On 16 June Senator Green referred to a 'long and proven track record of trolling and abusing' constituents online, but there was no substantiation. She then claimed that a political opponent of mine was forced to 'install CCTV cameras and an electronic security gate' on her home because of me.

On 16 June, Senator Polley referred to 'a long history of trolling and abusing' constituents on Facebook, which has 'undermined the safety and mental health' of an individual.

On 23 June the member for Brand referred to me 'treating women badly, trolling people on Facebook and continuing to behave badly'.

On 23 June, also, the member for Gellibrand said that I had the 'hide' to blame 'appalling trolling, bullying and harassment campaigns online on ADHD'.

On 23 June, the member for Griffith referred to me subjecting locals to 'false claims and social media abuse'.

On 23 June, also, the member for Macquarie said that my conduct 'diminishes the committee, the House and the parliament'.

On 23 June the member for Corangamite said that it establishes 'beyond question a character unfit to represent' and 'the kind of person the member for Bowman was long before he entered the House'. She said I 'viciously attacked female constituents from behind his computer screen'.

On 23 June the member for Lalor said:

He has a record of showing an absolute lack of empathy for the people he represents …

And then she went on to say this:

… good men who respect women … good men with integrity, good men with empathy and good men who would like to see the member for Bowman removed from the committee and removed from this parliament.

On 23 June, again, the member for Cooper said:

… the member for Bowman thinks he's entitled to be here in this House …

While there's no mechanism to prevent this hearsay and opinion, I note that not a single element of this communication has amounted to, or is ever likely to amount to, a formal complaint for assessment. I simply ask that these members reflect on this commentary, given evidence, which is now publicly available, that those matters lack any form of independent substantiation.

See this speech in context