House debates
Thursday, 8 September 2022
Motions
Ministerial Conduct
2:33 pm
Peter Dutton (Dickson, Liberal Party, Leader of the Opposition) Share this | Hansard source
I seek leave to move the following motion forthwith:
That the House:
(1) notes:
(a) the Prime Minister has repeatedly claimed to be bringing a higher standard of accountability, transparency and integrity to Government;
(b) the Prime Minister said on 8 July that "Well, what we need is transparency. I want politics to be cleaned up. And that's why we will have strict adherence to the Ministerial code of conduct";
(c) at least three Ministers have disclosed that they own shares, when the ownership of shares is specifically barred under the Ministerial Code;
(d) the Minister for Regional Development, Local Government and Territories has admitted to the House that she was in breach of the Ministerial Code;
(e) the Assistant Minister for Health holds managed funds which have significant shareholdings in health care and private health insurance companies;
(f) the Attorney-General invests in funds which have significant holdings in businesses which he is responsible for regulating, and;
(g) the Prime Minister and other Ministers when asked about these matters have repeatedly dismissed the questions and claimed that 'there is nothing to see here'; and
(2) and therefore calls upon the Prime Minister to either:
(a) live up to his rhetoric and take steps to actively enforce his Ministerial Code, including seeking formal advice from the Secretary of the Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet in relation to each of the Ministers reported to hold shares or to hold managed funds which hold shares in circumstances which give rise to a conflict of interest; or
(b) admit that this Prime Minister is in fact failing to enforce his Ministerial Code and in turn is failing this critical test of whether his government is demonstrating the higher standards of integrity and accountability that he has claimed to uphold.
Leave not granted.
I seek leave to suspend so much of the standing orders as would prevent me from moving the following motion—
No comments