House debates
Thursday, 19 October 2006
Questions without Notice
Iraq
2:19 pm
Kim Beazley (Brand, Australian Labor Party, Leader of the Opposition) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
$6.5 billion must be a record—
David Hawker (Speaker) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
Order! The Leader of the Opposition will come to his question.
Kim Beazley (Brand, Australian Labor Party, Leader of the Opposition) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
My question is to the Prime Minister. I refer to the Prime Minister’s comments on national radio this morning when he was asked whether it was necessary that Iraq remain a single state as a prerequisite for troop withdrawal and his reply:
Well, I think that’s desirable, but once again that’s a degree of micro management by another country and another leader that is not necessarily justified.
Will the Prime Minister now confirm that, as of today, his government’s policy of ‘getting the job done in Iraq’ no longer requires leaving behind a unified Iraqi state?
John Howard (Bennelong, Liberal Party, Prime Minister) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
What I made clear—
David Hawker (Speaker) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
Order! The Prime Minister will be heard.
John Howard (Bennelong, Liberal Party, Prime Minister) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
is that the future arrangements between the component parts of Iraq is a matter for the people of Iraq. I know why the Labor Party does not like that assessment. It is because it invests democracy in the Iraqi people. It is for the people of Iraq to determine the future state of arrangements between the different provinces of Iraq.
Ms Catherine King (Ballarat, Australian Labor Party, Shadow Parliamentary Secretary for Treasury) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
Ms King interjecting
John Howard (Bennelong, Liberal Party, Prime Minister) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
That is not for us to decide, and it does not in any way alter the policy of the government. The policy of the government is not to hand Iraq over to terrorists and, more importantly, not to hand the terrorists an enormous propaganda victory. That is the essence of this debate. The Leader of the Opposition can ask as many questions as he likes about future constitutional arrangements, but I do know this: if we had followed the advice of the Leader of the Opposition, we would still have Saddam Hussein butchering people in Iraq.
Cameron Thompson (Blair, Liberal Party) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
Mr Cameron Thompson interjecting
David Hawker (Speaker) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
Order! The member for Blair is warned!
John Howard (Bennelong, Liberal Party, Prime Minister) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
That is the reality and, as far as the government is concerned, the Labor Party’s policy would give an enormous boost to the terrorists—
Lindsay Tanner (Melbourne, Australian Labor Party, Shadow Minister for Finance) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
Mr Tanner interjecting
David Hawker (Speaker) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
The member for Melbourne is warned too!
John Howard (Bennelong, Liberal Party, Prime Minister) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
and do enormous long-term damage to the interests of this country.