House debates

Thursday, 2 November 2006

Adjournment

Agribusiness

4:54 pm

Photo of Mark BakerMark Baker (Braddon, Liberal Party) Share this | | Hansard source

I rise today to speak of an ongoing crisis facing Tasmanian and, for that matter, all Australian farmers. Tasmania is known as one of Australia’s greatest farming regions, growing some of the highest quality produce that you will find anywhere in the world. Yet the livelihood of these farmers and all Australian farmers is at stake, as cheap imports are flooding our shelves and threatening local jobs. Generic food labels are available at all leading supermarkets, enticing consumers with cheaper pricing and destroying Australia’s own vegetable industry. Supermarket giants need to take some responsibility for the state of Australia’s agribusiness. Walk into any Woolworths store and what you will find is their Home Brand packaged fruit and vegetables that are imported. These brands are appealing to a lot of Australians due to their cheaper price tags.

Let us not forget that Australian produce is recognised for quality and safety, which is something that cannot be said for a lot of the cheaper imported goods. Australia has one of the most stringent food codes in the world, where Australian produce is tested for some 61 chemicals. However, international trade standards require that imported produce need only to pass a 25-chemical test. So, yes, imported goods may be cheap, but at what price? As Tasmania, in particular north-west Tasmania, packages more than 80 per cent of Australia’s frozen vegetables and is a major producer of crops such as potatoes, carrots, beans, peas and fruit and some 50 per cent of the world’s poppies, this trend of cheap imports will come at a huge price to Australia’s economy, and the biggest price will be paid by our farmers and regional Australia.

Australia’s vegetable growers are finding it harder to compete on the global vegetable market for key commodities such as peas, potatoes and corn, principally due to our higher food safety standards, which are an increased production cost to our farmers that our global trading partners do not have to incorporate. However, let me state that I would advocate not the decreasing of our standards but, rather, that Australia’s producers be rewarded for this effort by loyalty from our retailers and consumers.

Simplot, another of Tasmania’s major vegetable packagers and suppliers, lost its position as the sole supplier of french fries to McDonald’s in Australia. Most Australians are aware that buying ‘Australian made’ means they are doing their bit for the economy. Australians are committed to the idea of keeping the money and the jobs in this country. However, food labelling on packaged goods can be confusing and not represent a true indication of country of origin. The labels ‘Made from local and imported goods’ and ‘Packaged locally from imported goods’ do not give consumers a fair indication of place of origin; therefore, they do not have the information to make an informed decision about the foods they are buying and what is best for their health and their budget—although we should note the proactive approach of Birds Eye through their Australian grown label.

Throughout Australia, and particularly in Tasmania, we have seen major companies make one decision after another which have had serious impacts on the livelihoods of farmers and on our rural communities. I believe that, in light of the ongoing crisis affecting vegetable growers, we as a country should take a hard look at corporate responsibility. An example I would offer, which underlines my strong views on corporate and social responsibility, is the manner in which Australian vegetable growers have been treated by some in corporate Australia. Last year, we had the situation where McDonald’s chose for the sake of a $4 million profit to decrease their intake of Tasmanian potatoes by some 50 per cent. It raised in the minds of my constituents and people throughout Australia the question of whether such corporations have a social conscience.

Today, long-term ramifications for the vegetable industry are being felt not only in Tasmania but throughout Australia, so in the future I hope corporations like McDonald’s—and I ask that they do—will start to fry Australian potatoes and not Australian farmers! Corporate and social responsibility is not about dictating to companies such as McDonald’s that they cannot make decisions in the best interests of their shareholders but about encouraging companies to consider the social and environmental impacts of their actions as part of their decision-making process.

To help drive growth in the vegetable industry, the federal government has provided more than $3 million in financial support for the development and implementation of Vegvision, a strategic plan for the vegetable industry. Their role is to oversee the investment of the $3 million via the implementing of Vegvision, with the vision being to double the current value of fresh, processed and packaged vegetables in real terms by stimulating consumer preference for Australian produce in domestic and global markets. For this industry to flourish, the corporate sector must also play their part—empower consumers and companies and use their powerful position to assist the agriculture and vegetable industry throughout this country.

Debate interrupted.