House debates
Tuesday, 27 February 2007
Questions without Notice
Superannuation
2:32 pm
Ken Ticehurst (Dobell, Liberal Party) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
My question is addressed to the Treasurer. Would the Treasurer outline to the House the latest information on superannuation funds under management in Australia and what this means for national savings?
Peter Costello (Higgins, Liberal Party, Treasurer) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
I thank the honourable member for Dobell for his question. Today the Australian Bureau of Statistics released data on managed funds which showed that in the December quarter of 2006 total consolidated assets of managed funds increased 4.6 per cent and grew to nearly $1.1 trillion. Let me say that again: the amount of managed funds in Australia as at the end of December 2006 is now about $1.1 trillion.
Simon Crean (Hotham, Australian Labor Party, Shadow Minister for Trade and Regional Development) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
Mr Crean interjecting
Philip Ruddock (Berowra, Liberal Party, Attorney-General) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
Mr Ruddock interjecting
David Hawker (Speaker) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
Order! If the member for Hotham and the Attorney-General want to have a conversation they can go outside.
Peter Costello (Higgins, Liberal Party, Treasurer) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
That is managed funds. That does not include self-managed superannuation, which is about 23 per cent of superannuation. Managed funds not only include superannuation but include other funds that are under management. If you were to bring in self-managed funds for superannuation, of course, the savings would be greater than $1.1 trillion.
The measure of savings in Australia’s national accounts has been negative for several quarters, but that measure does not capture the accumulation of assets. This is a point that has been made by Ric Battellino, the Deputy Governor of the Reserve Bank of Australia, who said in a speech in August of 2006:
... conventional measures of saving do not take into account capital gains. This has a particular bearing on Australian households because, as noted, they now hold a high proportion of their financial assets in investments such as shares and superannuation on which a significant part of the return is in the form of capital gains. ... we showed that once allowance is made for capital gains, the saving rate of Australian households ... is neither low nor falling.
In fact, it is estimated by the Reserve Bank of Australia that, looking at household net financial wealth, savings are around 24 per cent of disposable income. This measure suggests that Australia’s savings, by global standards, are actually quite high. This is an important point which has perhaps been overlooked in a lot of the economic commentary to date. When you do a household savings ratio and you are looking just at income, you are not allowing for the fact that many Australian households are actually making quite a rational decision to put their savings into better yielding returns, either in the stock market or in superannuation. In many European countries, you might put your money into a bank which then invests. That is counted in the conventional measure of saving because it is held at a bank. But many Australians have taken quite a rational decision to invest either directly into the share market or to invest through self-managed funds.
I have no doubt that the volume of money that Australians now have in managed funds and directly in the stock market has contributed greatly to the increase in stock market values. It was estimated at the beginning of this year that the complete market capitalisation of the Australian Stock Exchange was around $1.4 trillion. When you think that managed funds have $1.1 trillion and there is, in addition to that, considerable self-managed superannuation, you can see that there is an enormous stock of savings in the Australian economy which is now looking for a home to invest and no doubt—
Michael Hatton (Blaxland, Australian Labor Party) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
Mr Hatton interjecting
Peter Costello (Higgins, Liberal Party, Treasurer) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
On cue comes one of the genii of the Labor backbench who, if he listened as much as he talked, would have heard me say that managed funds do not include just superannuation. Managed funds include listed property trusts. They include cash management trusts.
Michael Hatton (Blaxland, Australian Labor Party) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
Mr Hatton interjecting
Peter Costello (Higgins, Liberal Party, Treasurer) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
And I suppose Paul Keating invented the cash management trust, did he? Did he invent the listed property trust?
Michael Hatton (Blaxland, Australian Labor Party) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
Mr Hatton interjecting
David Hawker (Speaker) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
Order! The member for Blaxland will not debate the question.
Peter Costello (Higgins, Liberal Party, Treasurer) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
I suppose he invented the self-managed superannuation funds! Let me guess—Paul Keating invented the internet!
Peter Costello (Higgins, Liberal Party, Treasurer) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
Sorry; that was Al Gore! Paul Keating got an Oscar yesterday, did he?
Michael Hatton (Blaxland, Australian Labor Party) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
Mr Hatton interjecting
Peter Costello (Higgins, Liberal Party, Treasurer) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
Some of these people are so out of touch they have not seen a good economic policy in so long they would not know how to recognise one when it came to you. That is why you cannot trust the Labor Party—caught fossilised in a period of time of ignorance until the light of the coalition came and shone on them, and it is going to stay there for a long period of time.