House debates
Wednesday, 8 August 2007
Questions without Notice
Hospitals
2:54 pm
Mark Baker (Braddon, Liberal Party) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
My question is addressed to the Minister for Health and Ageing. Would the minister inform the House of the federal government’s proposal to preserve the Mersey hospital and would he report on discussions held in Tasmania yesterday?
Tony Abbott (Warringah, Liberal Party, Leader of the House) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
I thank the member for Braddon for his question. I appreciate how important this issue is for him and for the people of north-western Tasmania. Let me say that north-western Tasmania has never had a better representative than this member for Braddon. Let me make it absolutely crystal clear—
Brendan O'Connor (Gorton, Australian Labor Party, Shadow Parliamentary Secretary for Industrial Relations) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
Mr Brendan O’Connor interjecting
Maria Vamvakinou (Calwell, Australian Labor Party) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
Ms Vamvakinou interjecting
Chris Hayes (Werriwa, Australian Labor Party) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
Mr Hayes interjecting
Tony Abbott (Warringah, Liberal Party, Leader of the House) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
I hope the people of north-west Tasmania are listening to the caterwauling from members opposite. If the members opposite have something to say to those people, let them say it and not cackle like hyenas in this parliament. Let me say to the people of Devonport, La Trobe, Kentish, Sheffield and Ulverstone that they deserve a comprehensive general hospital that delivers services suitable for a catchment of that size. The situation is very simple. The state Labor government wants to destroy Mersey hospital as it has been known, and the Commonwealth government wants to save it. The state government says that it has a plan for hospital services in the north-west. It is true; it has produced hundreds of pages of paper. It has not committed a single dollar—and, without a dollar, its plan is not worth the paper that it is written on.
Brendan O'Connor (Gorton, Australian Labor Party, Shadow Parliamentary Secretary for Industrial Relations) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
Mr Brendan O’Connor interjecting
Tony Abbott (Warringah, Liberal Party, Leader of the House) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
It is a paperweight and not a plan. The Commonwealth have a plan; we have a very good plan.
Wayne Swan (Lilley, Australian Labor Party, Shadow Treasurer) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
Mr Swan interjecting
David Hawker (Speaker) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
The member for Lilley! Order! The minister has the call and the minister will be heard.
Tony Abbott (Warringah, Liberal Party, Leader of the House) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
There are three essential elements to the Commonwealth plan. The Commonwealth will fund the hospital, the community will control the hospital and the hospital will deliver the same level of services that it safely and effectively delivered for many years before the state government started the downgrade. The Commonwealth plan means there will be $45 million more for health services in north-west Tasmania. The Commonwealth plan means one level of government funding the hospital and it means that the community that delivers the services and receives the services is the community that controls the services. This is a good model for public hospital service delivery. It is potentially a better model than that currently practised by the state governments.
Let me make this point: a state government that refused to accept what was, in effect, a $45-million free gift in health services for the people of north-western Tasmania would be insane; and a federal opposition that supported such a state government would be equally insane. This is a real challenge for the Leader of the Opposition: does he support what the Commonwealth is doing here? On Radio National, on Monday, he was given a chance to say where he stood five times. He wimped out five times—and he is turning his back now.
The people of Australia do not want a wimp for a Prime Minister and they do not want an alternative Prime Minister who swivels around in his seat like this whenever he is put under pressure. I say to the Leader of the Opposition: it is time to be a leader and not a follower; and it is time to be a decision maker and not a fence-sitter. He now says that he is some kind of a Liberal in disguise, but he cannot even be trusted to support Liberal policy.
Jenny Macklin (Jagajaga, Australian Labor Party, Shadow Minister for Families and Community Services) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
Ms Macklin interjecting
Tony Abbott (Warringah, Liberal Party, Leader of the House) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
He can never be trusted to deliver Liberal policy. The fact is that the people of Australia know what this guy is. He is just a phoney—a simple phoney.
2:59 pm
Nicola Roxon (Gellibrand, Australian Labor Party, Shadow Minister for Health) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
My question is to the Prime Minister. It follows on from the answer that the Minister for Health and Ageing has just given. Isn’t it the case, Prime Minister, that Liberal Senator Parry’s observation in the lift yesterday that your takeover of the Mersey hospital was a disaster is verified by a letter from Senator Parry to the Tasmanian Minister for Health and Human Services, dated 7 February 2007, in which he states:
... our situation requires a whole of state approach with State-wide services provided in a rational manner.
The best model, in my view, is ... where Tasmania would develop three centres of excellence.
Hobart, Launceston and Burnie would appear to be the logical choice.
It was signed ‘Senator Stephen Parry, Liberal, Tasmania’.
David Hawker (Speaker) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
Order! The Prime Minister is not responsible for comments by a colleague. If the Prime Minister chooses to answer, the Prime Minister has the call.
John Howard (Bennelong, Liberal Party, Prime Minister) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
Mr Speaker, I choose to answer the question. It gives me an opportunity to restate the government’s position. The government’s position is to keep the Mersey hospital open as a full public hospital facility. Unlike others, we happen to believe that providing that hospital would be a very good thing, but it is now apparent from the action of the member for Gellibrand that she and the Leader of the Opposition are opposed to keeping the Mersey hospital open. In other words, we are expected to believe that you can behave in question time as if you are opposed to something, you can pretend that you are opposed to something—
David Hawker (Speaker) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
I remind the member for Ballarat of rulings on posters.
John Howard (Bennelong, Liberal Party, Prime Minister) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
but, when you are actually accused of being opposed to something, you stand up and you say, ‘No, I didn’t say that.’ What kind of opposition do you have? Whether you agree with our decision or you do not agree with our decision—
Simon Crean (Hotham, Australian Labor Party, Shadow Minister for Trade and Regional Development) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
Mr Crean interjecting
David Hawker (Speaker) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
Order! The member for Hotham is warned!
John Howard (Bennelong, Liberal Party, Prime Minister) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
why doesn’t the opposition have the courage to stand up and say whether or not it supports keeping the Mersey hospital operating to full capacity? Our position is very clear—
Nicola Roxon (Gellibrand, Australian Labor Party, Shadow Minister for Health) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
Ms Roxon interjecting
David Hawker (Speaker) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
Order! The member for Gellibrand is warned too!
John Howard (Bennelong, Liberal Party, Prime Minister) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
The member for Gellibrand can play games. I do not think the people of—
Nicola Roxon (Gellibrand, Australian Labor Party, Shadow Minister for Health) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
Ms Roxon interjecting
David Hawker (Speaker) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
Order! I have made it clear that the holding up of posters is not in order. I have given the member for Gellibrand a warning. She continues to misbehave. She will remove herself under standing order 94(a).
The member for Gellibrand then left the chamber.
John Howard (Bennelong, Liberal Party, Prime Minister) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
What matters on this issue is not whether you can hold up a facsimile of a newspaper. What matters is who is prepared to look after the people of Devonport, who is prepared to keep open the Mersey hospital. Those on this side of the House are; those on that side of the House are opposed to doing it. They can score all the points they want.
Chris Hayes (Werriwa, Australian Labor Party) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
Mr Hayes interjecting
David Hawker (Speaker) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
Order! The member for Werriwa is warned!
John Howard (Bennelong, Liberal Party, Prime Minister) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
They can crack all the jokes they wish to, but there is a very simple difference on this issue.
Maria Vamvakinou (Calwell, Australian Labor Party) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
Ms Vamvakinou interjecting
John Howard (Bennelong, Liberal Party, Prime Minister) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
We are in favour of this hospital; the Labor Party is against it. We say to the 70,000 people in the catchment area covered by this hospital: we are prepared to invest $45 million to keep this hospital running. The Labor Party thinks so poorly of the people of Devonport that it spends question time making jokes—
Julia Irwin (Fowler, Australian Labor Party) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
Mrs Irwin interjecting
David Hawker (Speaker) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
Order! The Prime Minister will resume his seat. The member for Fowler has already been warned. She continues to interject. She will remove herself under standing order 94(a).
The member for Fowler then left the chamber.
John Howard (Bennelong, Liberal Party, Prime Minister) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
Can I let the people of Devonport and the people of Northern Tasmania know that, whilst the government has spent the last few minutes arguing in favour of keeping open a full public hospital facility in Devonport and being willing to contribute $45 million to it, the Labor Party opposition has been so contemptuous of their interests that it has had two members asked to leave the House, it has made jokes at the expense of the interests of the people of Devonport and it has put a passion for playing politics above caring for the interests of the people of Devonport.