House debates

Tuesday, 22 November 2011

Bills

Minerals Resource Rent Tax (Imposition — General) Bill 2011; Consideration in Detail

1:52 am

Photo of Tony CrookTony Crook (O'Connor, National Party) Share this | | Hansard source

by leave—I move amendments (1), (3) and (4) as circulated in my name together:

(1) Clause 4, page 2 (line 9), omit "Extraction factor", substitute "(extraction factor + emerging miner factor)".

(3) Clause 4, page 2 (after line 10), before the definition of extraction factor, insert:

emerging miner factor is:   (a)   where the group production of taxable resources for the miner for a year is less than 10 million tonnes—75%; or   (b)   otherwise—nil.

(4) Clause 4, page 2 (after line 11), after the definition of extraction factor, insert:

group production of taxable resources has the meaning given by section 175-15 of the Minerals Resource Rent Tax Act 2011.

Following lengthy consultations with industry and expert accountants, I seek to amend the MRRT imposition bills so that emerging miners do not pay any MRRT. This is done by creating a special emerging miner MRRT rate. This MRRT rate is determined by an emerging miner factor, which, when added to the existing extraction factor, reduces the MRRT rate to nil.

The emerging miner factor applies to miners where the group production of taxable resources for the miner for the year is less than 10 million tonnes. The government already acknowledges emerging miners to be those with less than 10 million tonnes production in the alternative valuation method, safe harbour provision, division No. 175. Although this relates to valuation methods and not liability, this safe harbour concept has merit to be used as a threshold at which to trigger the MRRT.

The government has confirmed that the $50 million profit threshold has no real policy basis. After industry consultation we have determined that a 10 million tonne per annum safe harbour is a more appropriate trigger to apply economic rent and appropriate demarcation between emerging miners and mature, established miners. This will protect small, emerging miners by reasonably excusing them from the liability under the MRRT. Question put:

Question put.

The House divided.   [01:58]

(The Speaker—Mr Harry Jenkins)

Question negatived.

1:59 am

Photo of Tony CrookTony Crook (O'Connor, National Party) Share this | | Hansard source

by leave—I move:

(2) Clause 4, page 2 (line 8), before "The", insert "(1)".

(5) Clause 4, page 2 (after line 11), at the end of the clause, add:

(2) However, notwithstanding subsection (1), the MRRT rate for an MRRT year (as defined by the Minerals Resource Rent Tax Act 2011) for each taxable resource (as defined by the Minerals Resource Rent Tax Act 2011) shall not exceed a benchmark rate, which shall for each *MRRT year be a rate that is calculated by reference to a formula or formulas, to be prescribed by regulations, to be applied to a mature miner (as defined by the Minerals Resource Rent Tax Act 2011) having the highest *MRRT liability (as defined by the Minerals Resource Rent Tax Act 2011)for each taxable resource in the *MRRT yearso that the relevant formulas determine abenchmark ratefor each taxable resource as a percentage, in the *MRRT year, that that miner's MRRT liabilityin that year bears to that miner's mining tax profit (as defined by the Minerals Resource Rent Tax Act 2011).

These amendments seek to ensure that smaller miners do not pay a higher rate of MRRT than the mature established miners. These additions to the impositions bill will ensure that the highest MRRT liability for the mature miners will act as a benchmark rate for all other miners. The benchmark rate will be determined as a percentage, in the MRRT year, that that miner's MRRT liabilityin that year bears to that miner's mining tax profit. The terms in this section refer to the definitions of the MRRT bill. This includes my proposed definition of mature miner as a miner whose group production and taxable resources for the MRRT year has exceed 40 million tonnes.

Photo of Harry JenkinsHarry Jenkins (Speaker) Share this | | Hansard source

A division is required. I would think, given that nobody left the chamber—and without it being a precedent—I will ring the bells for one minute and count this as a division under those provisions.

Question put.

The House divided.  [ 02:02 ]

(The Speaker—Mr Harry Jenkins)

Question negatived.

The question now is that the bill be agreed to.

Question put.

The House divided.  [ 02:04 ]

(The Speaker—Mr Harry Jenkins)

Question agreed to.

Bill agreed to.