House debates
Tuesday, 14 February 2012
Questions without Notice
Tasmania
2:30 pm
Dick Adams (Lyons, Australian Labor Party) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
Mr Speaker, I thank you very much for the opportunity to ask a question of the Minister for Regional Australia, Regional Development and Local Government and Minister for the Arts. I ask the minister: how is the government assisting Tasmania's transition to a more diversified economy to support jobs and sustainable, long-term growth?
2:31 pm
Simon Crean (Hotham, Australian Labor Party, Minister for Regional Australia, Regional Development and Local Government) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
I thank the member for Lyons for his question. He, like all Tasmanian members in this House, has been working to ensure that the Tasmanian economy does diversify and does it in a sustainable way. The truth is that the Tasmanian economy, like all of Australia, is an economy in transition, but the Tasmanian economy has a hugely strong future, and members on this side of the House know it.
Think of the comparative advantages that Tasmania has: clean air, clean energy, clean water, sustainable industries. Given that they, like so many other parts of the economy, are being impacted by a high dollar that takes competitiveness away, we need to find ways in which to make those industries and those comparative advantages more competitive.
We are in the circumstance of the greatest economic transformation the world has known. It is not just coming from China; it is coming from Asia; it is coming from India. Those on the other side want to stick their heads in the sand and do not think they need to play a role in it. We do.
The Prime Minister and the Premier of Tasmania signed a partnership agreement. I have been to Tasmania more than half-a-dozen times since that framework was put in place to talk about the detail. Forestry is an important part of this equation. We have the opportunity for the first time, through that agreement, to move to a forest products industry based on a sustainable resource. If we are able to move to a sustainable resource, why wouldn't we want to value-add to it? And that is what we want to do.
The trouble is that we have people down there seeking to run the industry down, while those who are in the Liberal Party in Tasmania sit silent. I say that when you enter an agreement you have to honour it. The agreement that was entered was to ensure that there would be wood supply—and that is what we say the Greens and all of the NGOs need to do. I say, and we know, that if this agreement falls over there will be no increase in reserves, no social licence and no ballast to underpin the industry. But listen—
Peter Slipper (Speaker) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
Honourable members on my left will remain silent, including the member for Forde—and the member for Cowan!
Simon Crean (Hotham, Australian Labor Party, Minister for Regional Australia, Regional Development and Local Government) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
If the circumstances are that the Greens want to oppose this, there is the opportunity for the Liberal Party to get behind this forward-looking agenda, not stick their head in the sand, as Tony Abbott does, and say, 'In the opposition we can't fix things, so don't even get bogged down with them.' That is the opposition approach here. It should not be the opposition's approach in Tasmania. (Time expired)
Bruce Billson (Dunkley, Liberal Party, Shadow Minister for Small Business, Competition Policy and Consumer Affairs) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
Mr Speaker—
Peter Slipper (Speaker) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
The member for Dunkley will resume his seat, because I suspect that the member for Lyons is seeking my attention, possibly to ask a supplementary question.
2:34 pm
Dick Adams (Lyons, Australian Labor Party) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
You read my mind, Mr Speaker. Your skills continue to impress the House.
Peter Slipper (Speaker) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
Your time is running. You only have 20 seconds.
Dick Adams (Lyons, Australian Labor Party) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
I ask the minister a supplementary question on whether he could give some examples of that transition in the Tasmanian economy. I know he has been in Tasmania just recently contributing to that.
2:35 pm
Simon Crean (Hotham, Australian Labor Party, Minister for Regional Australia, Regional Development and Local Government) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
I can, and they relate to two important opportunities for the Tasmanian economy. One is the dairy industry and one is the aquaculture industry, which the honourable member knows lots about. In the north-west of Tasmania we see the potential to grow extensively the dairy industry, but, unless they get the skills base and unless they get the infrastructure of electricity and power, that will not be able to expand. That is why, last weekend, we ensured that we invested in the training base and connecting the electricity to important parts of the economy.
The mention of water is rightly made because one of the great comparative advantages that Tasmania has is water and a surplus of it. The question is: how do we harness it? That is why the discussions that we have been having also go to the question of how we can expand the irrigation industry so that the water is not lost. That is going to advance the aquaculture industry down in the Huon Valley. It is going to expand the dairy industry, the grazing industry, the horticulture industry and the viticulture industry. This is what we have been able to do because this government committed resources to the diversification of the Tasmanian economy. Not only have we sat down and tried to give effect to the agreement reached; we want to help industries and jobs and workers—and we will do it. The opposition should get on board— (Time expired)
Peter Slipper (Speaker) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
The minister no longer has the call and he will resume his seat. The member for Dunkley does not yet have the call. It is good that the member for Moncrieff is back from New York. There is no need, though, to be so vociferous that you are making up for lost words during the period of your absence.