House debates
Monday, 12 October 2015
Questions without Notice
Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement
2:18 pm
Angus Taylor (Hume, Liberal Party) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
My question is to the Prime Minister. Will the Prime Minister outline to the House the benefits in jobs, investment and innovation for the Australia economy arising from the successful negotiation of the Trans-Pacific Partnership?
Mr Champion interjecting—
Ms Butler interjecting—
Tony Smith (Speaker) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
The member for Wakefield will cease interjecting. The member for Griffith will cease interjecting. They are both warned.
Malcolm Turnbull (Wentworth, Liberal Party, Prime Minister) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
Rarely has a minister in an Australia government come home with such a formidable achievement as the Minister for Trade and Investment. The minister for trade's efforts in Atlanta were remarkable. He was part of a group of 12 nations that negotiated the largest multilateral trade agreement for more than 20 years—12 nations. It includes the United States, Japan, Canada and Mexico. It includes Chile and Peru. It includes Singapore, Brunei, Malaysia, Vietnam and, of course, New Zealand. This TPP agreement opens up opportunities for Australians and Australian businesses right across the fastest growing part of the world economy. It includes economies that represent over 40 per cent of the world's GDP.
Ms Butler interjecting—
Tony Smith (Speaker) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
The member for Griffith has been warned.
Malcolm Turnbull (Wentworth, Liberal Party, Prime Minister) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
It gives the hope for more jobs, for more enterprise and for innovation right across our country. In the course of those negotiations—which, naturally, were very tough—there was significant pressure on the Australian government and its representative, the minister for trade, to change our laws on the protection of intellectual property for new medicines known as biologics. We held firm. We took the view that our laws are adequate as they are, and we struck the right balance between protecting the intellectual property of those investing in research and the development of new drugs. As a result, there will be no changes to our rules and regulations in this area, under the TPP, and no impact on the cost or availability of medicines under the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme.
I remind honourable members that, in the coalition government, we have succeeded in negotiating—or the minister for trade has succeeded in negotiating—free trade agreements with Japan, Korea and China. Each of them are vital foundation stones for our future prosperity. Our prosperity depends on us embracing the dynamic growth in the global economy, and, one after the other, these agreements—culminating in the TPP—are opening up the doors of each of those markets in a way that will ensure jobs, prosperity and business success for our children and grandchildren in the years and decades to come.