House debates
Monday, 27 March 2017
Questions without Notice
Taxation
2:47 pm
Jim Chalmers (Rankin, Australian Labor Party, Shadow Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Opposition) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
My question is to the Prime Minister. Can the Prime Minister confirm that scrapping the deficit levy in the budget will deliver a tax cut of more than $16,000 a year for millionaires? Why does the Prime Minister believe that millionaires deserve a tax cut but retail workers should cop a pay cut of up to $77 every week?
2:48 pm
Scott Morrison (Cook, Liberal Party, Treasurer) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
I thank the Prime Minister for the opportunity to respond to the member's question. It refers to millionaires.
Mr Khalil interjecting—
Ms Ryan interjecting—
Tony Smith (Speaker) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
The members for Wills and Lalor will leave under 94(a).
The members for Wills and Lalor then left the chamber.
Scott Morrison (Cook, Liberal Party, Treasurer) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
The member asked a question about the deficit levy, which he knows comes in for an income of $180,000—that is the top marginal tax rate. On 3AW on 21 April 2016 Neil Mitchell asked the Leader of the Opposition a question:
Is $180,000 a year rich?
The Leader of the Opposition said:
No, it's not …
But it does not stop there. The hypocrisy of those opposite is amazing. If I look at ABC's Insiders, the shadow Treasurer, talking about the deficit levy, said:
… we don't like this increase in tax … therefore we wouldn't be supporting it … We don't like it and we don't support it.
Dr Chalmers interjecting—
Scott Morrison (Cook, Liberal Party, Treasurer) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
He said:
Paul Keating … started the process of reducing those marginal tax rates to make us more competitive as a nation in a globalised world. That's the direction we should be heading in.
Well, the direction that the shadow minister wants to head in is completely the other direction.
Ms Plibersek interjecting—
Scott Morrison (Cook, Liberal Party, Treasurer) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
The best one comes down to the shadow Treasurer. Many years ago, when he was talking about the issue of tax cuts, he said:
The other tactic is to portray the Labor Party as being opposed to tax cuts or being opposed to tax cuts for high-income earners. Both of these allegations are untrue … We all like a tax cut. Everybody likes a tax cut. People at the upper end of the income scale like a tax cut, and they deserve a tax cut.
That was from Chris Bowen, now the shadow Treasurer, back in the June 2005. This shadow Treasurer cannot stand up to his own shadow.
Honourable members interjecting—
Tony Smith (Speaker) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
The member for Gorton is warned. Members on both sides will cease interjecting. I said at the start of question time I would not keep continually warning members. The member for Lyons was bellowing uncontrollably. He can go back to his office under 94(a), and others who have been warned or who were ejected last week are on similar notice. They are not going to disrupt question time. They were not elected to come here and disrupt the proceedings of the House.
The member for Lyons then left the chamber.