House debates
Thursday, 29 February 2024
Questions without Notice
Minister For Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs
2:52 pm
Peter Dutton (Dickson, Liberal Party, Leader of the Opposition) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
My question is to the Prime Minister. Prime Minister, the immigration minister is a disaster. His decisions have put Australians at risk—
Milton Dick (Speaker) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
Order! The Attorney-General yelling during a question is highly disorderly, and you are warned. Out of respect for the Leader of the Opposition, he'll begin his question again.
Peter Dutton (Dickson, Liberal Party, Leader of the Opposition) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
My question is to the Prime Minister. Prime Minister, the immigration minister is a disaster. His decisions have put Australians at risk, and women in Victoria are alleged to have been sexually assaulted. A hundred and forty-nine hardcore criminals—
Milton Dick (Speaker) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
Order! The member for Jagajaga will leave the chamber under 94(a). There are to be no interjections during questions. I'm not sure what the hard part about that is.
The member for Jagajaga then left the chamber.
Peter Dutton (Dickson, Liberal Party, Leader of the Opposition) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
A hundred and forty-nine hardcore criminals have been released into the community. The minister has not taken a single application to redetain one of these criminals, and now more Australians are being harmed, with the likely risk extending to many more Australians. When will you show leadership, stop being so weak and sack this minister?
2:53 pm
Anthony Albanese (Grayndler, Australian Labor Party, Prime Minister) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
'We are not in a position to defy an order of the High Court, and no-one is suggesting that they should do that.' Not my words—the words of Senator Paterson. 'Under the Constitution, you can't detain someone indefinitely. We accept that.' Not my words—the words of the Leader of the Opposition. 'The High Court made the decision. We respect that decision.' Not my words—the words of the shadow minister for immigration.
I'll tell you what's not strong. I'll tell you what strength is not. Strength is not asking for responses that would endanger judicial processes. That is not strong. There is no strength whatsoever in that. What is appalling is that the Leader of the Opposition knows full well that that is the case because he has been in that position, including when he was responsible for the legislation which our legislation was based upon. It was his legislation that he presided over, and he knows that that is the case.