House debates
Thursday, 21 November 2024
Questions without Notice
Future Fund
2:00 pm
Peter Dutton (Dickson, Liberal Party, Leader of the Opposition) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
My question is to the Prime Minister. The Future Fund was set up by the Howard government in 2006 to strengthen Australia's long-term financial position. For nearly 20 years, governments of both sides have respected the independence of the fund by not meddling with its investment mandate. Having blown the bank and fuelled inflation with its reckless spending, Labor is now raiding the nation's nest egg to cover its economic failures. Why are Australians paying for the Albanese government's economic incompetence?
2:01 pm
Anthony Albanese (Grayndler, Australian Labor Party, Prime Minister) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
I was going to give this question to the Treasurer, but the bit in the question about spending is just too much to resist. When we came to office, there was a $78 billion deficit projected and we turned that into a $22 billion surplus, and the following year we turned it into another $15 billion surplus. Those opposite were elected in 2013 with a commitment to do a surplus in the first year and every year thereafter.
Jim Chalmers (Rankin, Australian Labor Party, Treasurer) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
None for nine, you geniuses!
Milton Dick (Speaker) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
The Treasurer will cease interjecting.
Anthony Albanese (Grayndler, Australian Labor Party, Prime Minister) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
In spite of the money ripped out of health, education and services—in places like Veterans' Affairs, people couldn't get their payments done—and in spite of the robodebt debacle and everything that we've seen, they ran deficit after deficit after deficit, time after time after time.
Milton Dick (Speaker) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
The Leader of the Opposition is entitled to raise a point of order, and he shall do so now.
Peter Dutton (Dickson, Liberal Party, Leader of the Opposition) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
Mr Speaker, I'd firstly like you to deal with the comment from the Treasurer, who surely will have the decency to withdraw it.
Milton Dick (Speaker) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
Will the Treasurer withdraw, to assist the House?
Jim Chalmers (Rankin, Australian Labor Party, Treasurer) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
I withdraw, Mr Speaker.
Peter Dutton (Dickson, Liberal Party, Leader of the Opposition) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
It's pretty beneath the Treasurer, I would have thought—but, anyway, I guess we see your true character. It's on relevance. The Prime Minister was asked about the Future Fund. Is the Prime Minister prepared to defend his decision on the Future Fund?
Milton Dick (Speaker) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
The Leader of the House is also entitled to rise on the point of order. I'm not sure why everyone wants to stop everyone raising points of order. We can easily do that by not taking any. I'm sure no-one wants that. The Leader of the House on the point of order.
Mr Tony Burke (Watson, Australian Labor Party, Leader of the House) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
When a question refers to spending and the answer is referring to spending, it's being directly relevant.
Milton Dick (Speaker) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
It was also talking about the financial position, the fuelling of inflation and about Australians paying for economic decisions, so, in any universe, that's a very broad topic. The Prime Minister will need to remain relevant to the question that he was asked, which is a very broad question containing many moving parts.
Anthony Albanese (Grayndler, Australian Labor Party, Prime Minister) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
I certainly will, Mr Speaker. The Leader of the Opposition, with the broadness of that question, has given me an opportunity not just to confirm the independence of the Future Fund—that's very important—and the fact that their mandate will be about maximising returns, which it will be.
I'm also asked about inflation. Inflation was at 6.1 per cent when we came to office, and now it's at 2.8 per cent. We've done that while one million jobs have been created during this term of office. Unemployment is at 4.1 per cent. Real wages are increasing because we want to make sure that people earn more, and there are also tax cuts for all Australians because we want people to keep more of what they earn. Across the board, when you look at all the economic indicators—the Leader of the Opposition stands and asks a broad question about the economy and then we see the nuclear overreaction from him when we actually go through what the economic figures are.
We know that there are alternatives because he wants Australians to pay more. He has a housing scheme that will drive up house prices. He has a supermarket scheme that will drive up grocery prices. He has an energy scheme that will drive up power prices. And he has a NBN scheme—I notice they want to privatise the NBN now. They want to privatise the NBN, and we know what the consequences for regional Australia will be.