This data was produced by OpenAustralia from a variety of sources.
Dan Repacholi MP

- Australian Labor Party Representative for Hunter
- Entered House of Representatives on 21 May 2022 — Federal election
- Email me whenever Dan Repacholi speaks (no more than once per day)
Most recent appearances in parliament
- Matters of Public Importance: Regional Australia (27 Mar 2025)
“For too long, regional Australia was treated like an afterthought, a place the previous coalition only remembered when they needed votes. For a decade, they promised the world but delivered nothing but empty press conferences and broken roads. They talked up big but, when it came to action, they couldn't build a Lego set let alone infrastructure for our communities in desperate need. Under...”
- Statements by Members: Workplace Relations: Mining Industry (27 Mar 2025)
“Three years ago, the coalition, especially the Nationals, said, 'You shouldn't trust Labor to support the Hunter's coal industry.' They said that coalmines would close under our watch and that workers would be left high and dry. That couldn't be more wrong. The coalmines in the Hunter are thriving. In fact, there has not been a single coalmine closure under this government—not one....”
- Bills: Telecommunications Amendment (Enhancing Consumer Safeguards) Bill 2025; Second Reading (27 Mar 2025)
“Just in your seats.”
Numbers
Please note that numbers do not measure quality. Also, Representatives may do other things not currently covered by this site. (More about this)
- Has spoken in 56 debates in the last year — well above average amongst Representatives.
- People have made 0 comments on this Representative's speeches — average amongst Representatives.
- This Representative's speeches are understandable to an average 16–17 year old, going by the Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level score.
- 3 people are tracking whenever this Representative speaks — email me whenever Dan Repacholi speaks.
- Has used three-word alliterative phrases (e.g. "she sells seashells") 136 times in debates — well below average amongst Representatives. (Why is this here?)