Senate debates
Wednesday, 29 November 2006
Copyright Amendment Bill 2006
Second Reading
12:03 pm
Joe Ludwig (Queensland, Australian Labor Party, Manager of Opposition Business in the Senate) Share this | Hansard source
I move:
At the end of the motion, add “but the Senate:
- (a)
- notes:
- (i)
- the rushed and inadequate process for drafting this bill and its numerous amendments, allowing little time for detailed analysis of its provisions by industry, experts and consumers;
- (ii)
- notes the Government’s decision to not adopt a general “fair use” provision, thereby focussing debate on the detailed exceptions and necessitating a stifling policy decision which limits format shifting to current, but not emerging technologies;
- (iii)
- notes the initial far reaching strict liability provisions (which the Government has itself recognised needed to be dropped) but flags concerns that other unintended consequences may unfairly penalise consumers;
- (iv)
- notes the concerns of the internet industry about unintended consequences of this bill;
- (v)
- notes the need for a strong public education campaign about copyright laws;
- (vi)
- notes the Government’s failure to include the recommended two year review in the legislation; and
- (b)
- expresses grave reservations, despite a number of positive aspects of the bill, that the overall package it cumbersome, complex and confusing”.
No comments