Senate debates

Wednesday, 29 November 2006

Copyright Amendment Bill 2006

Second Reading

12:03 pm

Photo of Joe LudwigJoe Ludwig (Queensland, Australian Labor Party, Manager of Opposition Business in the Senate) Share this | Hansard source

I move:

At the end of the motion, add  “but the Senate:

(a)
notes:
(i)
the rushed and inadequate process for drafting this bill and its numerous amendments, allowing little time for detailed analysis of its provisions by industry, experts and consumers;
(ii)
notes the Government’s decision to not adopt a general “fair use” provision, thereby focussing debate on the detailed exceptions and necessitating a stifling policy decision which limits format shifting to current, but not emerging technologies;
(iii)
notes the initial far reaching strict liability provisions (which the Government has itself recognised needed to be dropped) but flags concerns that other unintended consequences may unfairly penalise consumers;
(iv)
notes the concerns of the internet industry about unintended consequences of this bill;
(v)
notes the need for a strong public education campaign about copyright laws;
(vi)
notes the Government’s failure to include the recommended two year review in the legislation; and
(b)
expresses grave reservations, despite a number of positive aspects of the bill, that the overall package it cumbersome, complex and confusing”.

Comments

No comments