Senate debates

Thursday, 14 June 2007

Evidence Amendment (Journalists’ Privilege) Bill 2007

In Committee

8:56 pm

Photo of David JohnstonDavid Johnston (WA, Liberal Party, Minister for Justice and Customs) Share this | Hansard source

With respect to Greens amendment (1), the additional factor is unnecessary. The explanatory memorandum makes it clear that the factors listed under section 126B(4) are not limited to those listed. Indeed, the explanatory memorandum notes the intention is to protect the freedom of the press and enhance the public’s right to know. The very nature of the bill makes clear the intention to maintain and protect the confidences of journalists. I also add to this that it is very clear that the bill is modelled to conform and to be uniform with the New South Wales legislation. With respect to Greens amendment (2), it is necessary to give national security the greatest weight in order to ensure disclosure of information in circumstances where national security is relevant. It updates the New South Wales model, which was developed, as I think I mentioned, in 1998. It is also appropriate that the test be the same as in other legislation where national security is a factor.

Comments

No comments