Senate debates

Monday, 16 March 2009

Answers to Questions on Notice

Question Nos 884, 908, 909, 931, 932, 946, 954, 955, 974, 992, 993, 1000, 1008, 1017 and 1026

3:23 pm

Photo of Michael RonaldsonMichael Ronaldson (Victoria, Liberal Party, Shadow Special Minister of State) Share this | Hansard source

Mr Deputy President, I rise on a point of order. My reading of standing order 74(5)(c) is that where there has not been a satisfactory explanation I can move that motion without notice. If that is not correct, please tell me, but my understanding of both paragraphs (b) and (c) is that leave is not required because it deals with moving a motion without notice.

Comments

No comments