Senate debates
Wednesday, 25 November 2009
Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme Bill 2009 [No. 2]; Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme (Consequential Amendments) Bill 2009 [No. 2]; Australian Climate Change Regulatory Authority Bill 2009 [No. 2]; Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme (Charges — Customs) Bill 2009 [No. 2]; Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme (Charges — Excise) Bill 2009 [No. 2]; Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme (Charges — General) Bill 2009 [No. 2]; Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme (CPRS Fuel Credits) Bill 2009 [No. 2]; Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme (CPRS Fuel Credits) (Consequential Amendments) Bill 2009 [No. 2]; Excise Tariff Amendment (Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme) Bill 2009 [No. 2]; Customs Tariff Amendment (Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme) Bill 2009 [No. 2]; Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme Amendment (Household Assistance) Bill 2009 [No. 2]
In Committee
8:24 pm
Penny Wong (SA, Australian Labor Party, Minister for Climate Change and Water) Share this | Hansard source
Senator, I assume you know, from being in government, that Treasury uses a great many assumptions behind its budget projections. So I could not answer for every single parameter which was assumed, for example, in MYEFO. I can tell you that the MYEFO assumption about the reduced carbon price was made because the Australian dollar was assumed to be at a higher level and therefore, following through, there was an assumption as to a lower Australian dollar carbon price. So I am not sure what your question really goes to—perhaps I am misunderstanding it. Again I say that we did not assume in our modelling any type of policy action, because that is a matter for domestic policy; we assumed, consistent with, I think, what is logical, that you would see action at various times by developed nations and that you would see growth and then decline by developing nations, particularly India and China.
No comments