Senate debates
Wednesday, 12 May 2010
Bisphenol-a
3:38 pm
Rachel Siewert (WA, Australian Greens) Share this | Hansard source
I move:
- That the Senate—
- (a)
- notes:
- (i)
- the growing body of evidence that the chemical Bisphenol A (BPA), used in plastics, including food packaging, is harmful to humans even in minute quantities and is unsuitable for use in babies’ products, such as baby bottles and food containers,
- (ii)
- that research has linked BPA to a range of health problems, including reproductive problems, endometriosis (a chronic gynaecological disease), heart disease, diabetes and abnormalities in liver enzymes, among other conditions,
- (iii)
- the recent letter by eight toxicologists and cancer specialists from the United States of America (US), Britain and Italy, published in The Independent newspaper in the United Kingdom on 8 April 2010, that calls for the products containing BPA used for baby and children’s food and liquid packaging to be withdrawn and replaced by less hazardous substances,
- (iv)
- that children’s products containing BPA have been banned in Denmark, Canada and a number of states in the US,
- (v)
- that a number of manufacturers have voluntarily stopped using BPA in babies’ products, demonstrating that alternatives are available, and
- (vi)
- that Food Standards Australia New Zealand permits the continued use of this chemical in babies’ products in Australia; and
- (b)
- calls on the Rudd Government to reassess the public health risk of BPA to all Australian consumers.
Question agreed to.
No comments