Carol Brown (Tasmania, Australian Labor Party) Share this | Hansard source

On behalf of the Chair of the Joint Standing Committee on Electoral Matters, I present the report, Review of the AEC analysis of the FWA report on the HSU, together with the minutes of proceedings of the committee and the transcript of evidence.

Ordered that the report be printed.

by leave—I move:

That the Senate take note of the report.

In this report the committee makes 13 recommendations to improve Australia’s disclosure arrangements and to enhance the transparency of the flow of money through our political system.

During this inquiry the committee reviewed the Australian Electoral Commission’s—the AEC—analysis of the Fair Work Australia—the FWA—report on the Health Services Union national office. It also considered a list of matters provided by the AEC as possible measures to improve the operation of the Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918.

The committee’s focus was on disclosure obligations under the Electoral Act. It was not the committee’s role to forensically examine internal HSU authorisation processes, or to adjudicate on alleged contraventions against the Fair Work (Registered Organisations) Act or other alleged fraudulent behaviour.

This was outside the committee's terms of reference. A number of other processes are underway to address those matters.

The committee considered 17 possible measures provided by the AEC for consideration and supported most of these measures. A number of the recommendations made in this report have been made in previous reports, including to:

Changes to the penalties for breaches of the Electoral Act are also needed. The committee has recommended introducing administrative penalties for more straightforward breaches, such as a failure to lodge a return by the due date. This will enable the Australian Electoral Commission to deal more effectively with these types of offences. The committee has also recommended strengthening the penalties for the more serious offences, including those involving fraud.

In this inquiry it was clear that the category of ‘associated entities’—which requires disclosure by certain organisations with close links to political parties—is confusing and is not operating as effectively as it should. To address this, the committee recommends clarifying the definition of an ‘associated entity’.

A significant reform the committee is proposing is to deem registered parties as bodies corporate for the purposes of the Electoral Act, to better focus the responsibility for breaches on the parties. It is intended that this will encourage political parties to ensure that the person tasked with lodging returns is suitably qualified to perform the role, and that effective systems are in place to ensure a complete and accurate return is lodged.

Another gap in the current arrangements is in the current disclosure period for new candidates, which only commences from their preselection or nomination. The committee has recommended introducing a requirement for new candidates to disclose relevant donations and gifts received and money spent in the 12 months prior to their preselection or nomination.

There were certain measures that the committee did not support, which were:

In developing its recommendations, the committee aimed to strike the right balance between the goals of transparency and accountability, and the administrative realities for the parties, organisations and individuals with reporting obligations. The committee believes that these recommendations strike the right balance.

On behalf of the committee I thank the organisations and individuals who assisted the committee during the inquiry through submissions or participating at the public hearings in Canberra and Melbourne. I also thank my colleagues on the committee for their work and contribution to this report, and the secretariat for their work on this inquiry. I commend the report to the Senate.