Senate debates
Thursday, 15 November 2018
Bills
Electoral Legislation Amendment (Electoral Funding and Disclosure Reform) Bill 2017; In Committee
5:13 pm
Larissa Waters (Queensland, Australian Greens) Share this | Hansard source
by leave—I move Australian Greens amendments (1) to (4) on sheet 8546 revised together:
(1) Clause 2, page 2 (table items 2 and 3), omit the table items, substitute:
(2) Schedule 1, page 3 (before line 7), before item 1, insert:
1AA At the end of Part I
Add:
4E Concurrent operation of State and Territory laws
This Act is not intended to exclude or limit the operation of a law of a State or Territory that is capable of operating concurrently with this Act.
(3) Schedule 1, item 4, page 4 (line 12), omit "$13,500", substitute "$1,000".
(4) Schedule 1, items 5 and 6, page 4 (lines 16 to 21), omit the items, substitute:
5 Subsection 287(1) (definition of gift )
Repeal the definition, substitute:
gift means any disposition of property made by a person to another person, being a disposition made without consideration in money or money's worth or with inadequate consideration, and includes:
(a) the provision of a service (other than volunteer labour) for no consideration or for inadequate consideration; and
(b) an annual subscription paid to a political party, to a State branch of a political party or to a division of a State branch of a political party by a person in respect of the person's membership of the party, branch or division; and
(c) a payment in respect of attendance at a fundraiser or similar event held by, or for the benefit of, a political entity;
but does not include:
(d) a payment under Division 3; or
(e) any visit, experience or activity provided for the purposes of a political exchange program.
These amendments relate to, firstly, the commencement date of these new laws. Importantly, amendment (2) goes to whether or not the federal government can override state donation rules. Senator Farrell has received advice that is in conflict with the advice that I've received, and I've formed my own view on the effect of the amendments. My understanding is that, as the bill is currently drafted, it will still enable property developers to avoid the donations ban that would otherwise apply in Queensland. My understanding is that the Queensland laws will now need to be amended to require that donations be placed into a separate bank account. If that amendment goes through the Queensland parliament—presumably it will—we won't have a problem. But until such time as that amendment occurs, this bill enables the developer donation ban to be circumvented.
I take objection to the description of my legal view of that as being grandstanding. It's quite the contrary. We're actually trying to clean up politics here. We're trying to get big money out of politics and we're trying to make sure that the rules that were brought in in Queensland by your counterpart, Senator O'Farrell, are effective. So we have moved this amendment in—
No comments