Santo Santoro (Queensland, Liberal Party, Minister for Ageing) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source

I present the government’s response to the report of the Senate Standing Committee on Community Affairs on its inquiry into gynaecological cancers in Australia, and I seek leave to have the document incorporated in Hansard.

Leave granted.

The document read as follows—

Senate Community Affairs References Committee

Inquiry into Gynaecological Cancer in Australia

Commonwealth Government Response to the Committee’s Report:

Breaking the silence: a national voice for gynaecological cancers

February 2007

Introduction

Australia has one of the best systems of cancer care in the world. In comparison to other developed countries, Australia has relatively high cancer incidence rates but comparatively low cancer mortality rates, indicating that cancer survival in Australia is relatively good. The health system in Australia is performing well in lengthening survival through early detection and in the treatment of cancer.

The Commonwealth Government provides significant resources in relation to the prevention and treatment of gynaecological cancers. Advances continue to be made in gynaecological cancer research; during 2000-06 the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) provided more than $44 million for research into gynaecological cancers.

The Government has invested heavily in screening for female cancers, notably breast and cervical cancer. The National Cervical Screening Program (NCSP) has been so successful in detecting and following up pre-cancerous abnormalities that the incidence of cervical cancer has fallen by 57% and mortality by 58% in the past ten years.

The Government also funds a national ovarian cancer program through the National Breast Cancer Centre (NBCC). The NBCC has developed evidenced based guidelines, endorsed by the NHMRC, for the management of women with epithelial ovarian cancer. It is now focussing on assisting with enhancing treatment through the development of a guide for health professionals on multidisciplinary cancer care meetings.

Burden of Gynaecological Cancer in Australia

Each year in Australia an estimated 462,000 people are diagnosed with cancer. Approximately 374,000 of these cases are less threatening types of skin cancer – namely non-melanocytic skin cancer. Over 88,000 people will be diagnosed with other types of cancer and approximately 36,000 people will die per year from cancer. Cancer accounts for 31% of male deaths and 26% of female deaths in Australia per annum. As a group of cancers, gynaecological cancers are the third most common form of cancer for Australian women, and the fourth most common form of cancer mortality in Australian women.

The top five frequently occurring cancers for females in Australia, 2001

Incidence			Mortality
Cancer Site	% of all Female Cancer Incidence	Risk of diagnosis by age 75	Cancer Site	% of all Female Cancer Mortality
Breast	29.1	1 in 11	Breast	16.3
Colorectal	14.5	1 in 26	Lung	15.0
Gynaecological	9.6	1 in 34	Colorectal	13.5
Melanoma	9.5	1 in 34	Gynaecological	9.6
Lung	7.1	1 in 46	Unknown Primary Site	7.7

Key gynaecological cancer statistics

Type of cancer	Incidence1,2,3	Risk of diagnosis by age 754	Mortality1,2,3	5 year survival rate5 (1992-97)
Uterus	1,537 (2001)	1 in 75	299 (2001)	81.4%
Ovarian	1,273 (2002)	1 in 101	851 (2004)	42.0%
Cervix	689 (2002)	1 in 201	212 (2004)	74.6%
Vulva, vagina and placenta	319 (2001)	1 in 569	100 (2001)	N/A

Sources:

¹ Cancer in Australia 2001, AIHW

² Cervical screening in Australia 2003-2004 - AIHW - August 2006.

³ Ovarian Cancer in Australia: An Overview 2006, AIHW & NBCC, 2006

⁴ National Cancer Statistics Clearing House, AIHW

⁵ Cancer Survival in Australia 2001, AIHW

Mortality

Mortality rates for cervical cancer have declined by an average of 5.2% per annum since 1991. These gains are due in part to the success of the National Cervical Screening Program.

Mortality rates for cancer of the ovary and endometrial declined on average by 0.7% and 1.6% per annum respectively between 1991 and 2001.

Survival

The incidence of ovarian cancer has risen over the past two decades. However, the risk of women under the age of 75 years dying from this disease has declined from 1 in 142 (in 1983) to 1 in 176 (in 2004). (Source: Ovarian Cancer in Australia: An Overview 2006, AIHW & NBCC, 2006)

Cancer Australia

Cancer Australia is a new Commonwealth Government agency established to help reduce the impact of cancer in the community. It will provide national leadership to increase coordination of cancer control initiatives and improve outcomes for people affected by cancer.

Cancer Australia will collaborate with consumers, government, health professionals, researchers, cancer organisations and other stakeholders to:

• enhance support, information and participation in decision-making for people affected by cancer;
• improve the quality of cancer care, and support for health professionals; and
• increase coordination and funding of cancer research, and actively support cancer clinical trials.

National Breast Cancer Centre

The NBCC was established in 1995 by the Commonwealth Government in response to community concerns about the human cost of breast cancer. In 2001 the role of the NBCC was expanded to incorporate the Ovarian Cancer Program, which aims to improve the health outcomes for women with ovarian cancer.

The National Health and Medical Research Council

The National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC), the main health and medical research funding body, provides research support through a variety of mechanisms, including support for individual research projects, broad programs of research, training awards for scholars and postdoctoral fellows, career research fellowships and special strategic research programs.

During 2000-06 the NHMRC provided more than $44 million for research into gynaecological cancers. In 2006, the NHMRC awarded more than $98.5 million for new cancer-related research for over 190 new grants, awarded for periods of up to 5 years. This included research on the causes and treatment of cancers and research that focuses specifically on cancers of particular concern or common in the Australian population: ovarian cancer ($5.7 million) and breast cancer ($12.9 million). Not all of the cancer-related research funding target a particular type of cancer. Some of the research looks at the common mechanisms in cancer, thus having relevance to all forms of cancer. Guidelines, which have either been approved or endorsed by the NHMRC, have been developed for all eight priority cancers, and for the psychosocial care of adults with cancer.

Recommendations and Commonwealth Government Responses

Recommendation 1

2.54 The Committee recommends that the Commonwealth Government establish a Centre for Gynaecological Cancers within the auspices of Cancer Australia. The Centre will have responsibility for giving national focus to gynaecological cancer issues and improving coordination of existing health, medical and support services and community projects.

Commonwealth Government Response

The Commonwealth Government agrees to establish a Centre for Gynaecological Cancers within the auspices of Cancer Australia. Once the Centre has been established, the Government will ask it to undertake an early assessment of existing gynaecological cancer services and to provide a national focus to gynaecological cancer issues.

Recommendation 2

2.55 The Committee recommends, as a matter of priority, that the Centre for Gynaecological Cancers develops a website that is a ‘one-stop shop’ for reliable information on all issues relating to gynaecological cancers, including education, research and availability of services. The website of the National Institutes of Health in the United States is an example of a successful website upon which to base an Australian equivalent.

2.56 In all aspects of its work, the Centre should make optimal use of communications and information technology, including the Internet, to bring people together to discuss issues.

Commonwealth Government Response

The Commonwealth Government agrees with this recommendation.

The Government will ask the new Centre for Gynaecological Cancers to develop a strategic plan to guide its work which includes the development of a website and mechanisms to make optimal use of communications and information technologies to support information sharing on gynaecological cancer issues.

Recommendation 3

2.57 The Committee recommends that a working group be formed, with the support of Cancer Australia, consisting of individuals with experience and expertise in gynaecological cancers to best develop the roles, responsibilities and priorities of the Centre for Gynaecological Cancers.

Commonwealth Government Response

The Commonwealth Government agrees with this recommendation and will seek advice from Cancer Australia and the relevant professional organisations (see recommendation 2.60) on the composition and terms of reference of the working group.

Recommendation 4

2.58 The Committee recommends that the Commonwealth Government provide the Centre for Gynaecological Cancers with seed-funding of $1 million for establishment and operational costs.

Commonwealth Government Response

The Commonwealth Government agrees to provide $1 million in seed funding to support the establishment and initial operation of the Centre.

Recommendation 5

2.59 The Committee recommends that a national secretariat be formed within Cancer Australia to define the Centre for Gynaecological Cancers' ongoing objectives and to evaluate the success of the Centre after two years.

Commonwealth Government Response

The Commonwealth Government supports this recommendation.

The Government will ask Cancer Australia to implement this recommendation.

2.60 The Committee further recommends that the Centre and its national secretariat work closely with Cancer Australia and its advisory groups, particularly the Gynaecological Cancer Advisory Group, and the National Breast Cancer Centre to ensure a cohesive approach to improving gynaecological cancer care in Australia.

Commonwealth Government Response

The Commonwealth Government supports this recommendation and notes the benefits of developing a coordinated approach to improving gynaecological cancer care.

Recommendation 6

3.108 The Committee recommends that the Commonwealth Government commit further recurrent funding for:

• basic research and clinical trials on topics relating to gynaecological cancers; and
• academic research positions in areas relating to gynaecological cancers.

Commonwealth Government Response

Through the NHMRC, the Commonwealth Government has provided $44 million dollars from 2000-2006 to gynaecological cancer research.

The Government will ask Cancer Australia and the NHMRC to work together to ascertain the current level and adequacy of funding into gynaecological cancer research in Australia.

Recommendation 7

3.109 The Committee recommends that the Commonwealth Government in collaboration with Cancer Australia:

• review the current level of funding allocated to bodies and individuals undertaking gynaecological cancer research in Australia; and
• provide leadership in relation to the allocation of research funding for gynaecological cancers; and
• improve awareness within the research community about the work being undertaken in order to minimise duplication.

Commonwealth Government Response

Cancer Australia was established by the Commonwealth Government to provide national leadership in cancer control, guide improvements to cancer prevention and care, ensure treatment is scientifically based, and oversee a dedicated budget for research into cancer.

In December 2006, Cancer Australia convened a National Research Advisory Group and a Research Roundtable meeting. The Cancer Research Roundtable brought together key government, non-government and community groups who fund cancer research in Australia. The Cancer Research Roundtable allows funders of cancer research to collaborate and coordinate funding and offers an opportunity to foster research collaboration, reduce duplication and build research capacity.

In 2007 the National Research Advisory Group will oversee an audit of cancer research in Australia. This audit will identify current cancer research activity and inform the development of a cancer research plan.

Cancer Australia and the NHMRC will work together with other funders to minimise any duplication of effort, to keep a watching brief on the ongoing investment of research in gynaecological cancers and will report back to the Government.

Recommendation 8

4.183 The Committee recommends that Cancer Australia work with the gynaecological cancer sector on an ongoing basis to develop national strategies improving the visibility of, and access to, screening, treatment and support services for women with gynaecological cancers.

Commonwealth Government Response

The Commonwealth Government agrees that Cancer Australia should work with existing relevant organisations and notes that this is consistent with its role to provide national leadership in cancer control.

Recommendation 9

4.184 The Committee recommends that the Commonwealth Government's funding and leadership of the National Cervical Screening Program continue and that strategies be implemented to improve screening participation rates for Australian women, particularly for Indigenous women.

Commonwealth Government Response

The Commonwealth Government will continue its funding and leadership of the National Cervical Screening Program and has initiatives in place which aim to improve screening rates for Australian women.

The National Cervical Screening Program (NCSP) is funded under the Public Health Outcome Funding Agreements (PHOFAs). Under the PHOFAs state and territory governments are required to implement a range of strategies to improve participation in the NCSP, including participation rates of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander women.

In the 2006-07 Budget funding was continued to encourage general practitioners to increase rates of participation in the NCSP, particularly in women who were lapsed or had never been screened, including Indigenous women. Since the initiative commenced, almost 190,000 previously under screened women have been screened by their GPs.

The NCSP, at the state and territory level, employs Indigenous staff to advise on communication and cultural matters, and uses Aboriginal Health Workers wherever possible to either provide services or communicate the importance of screening to Indigenous women.

A principles and practices document Principles, standards and guidelines for providers of cervical screening services for Indigenous women was developed in 2003, in consultation with Indigenous women, to assist in addressing barriers faced by Indigenous women when attending health services for cervical screening, and to maximise their access to cervical screening.

4.185 The Committee further recommends that the Commonwealth work collaboratively with State and Territory Governments to promote the National Cervical Screening Program for all Australian women.

Commonwealth Government Response

The Commonwealth Government will continue to work collaboratively with state and territory governments to promote the National Cervical Cancer Screening Program.

4.186 The Committee further recommends that the Commonwealth Government explore the extension of Medicare rebates for Pap tests performed by nurse practitioners, regional nurses and Indigenous health workers who are suitably trained.

Commonwealth Government Response

Medicare rebates for Pap smears provided by a practice nurse on behalf of a general practitioner in rural and remote areas have been available since January 2005. This was extended from 1 November 2006 to provide Medicare rebates for practice nurses to undertake Pap smears and other preventive checks related to women's sexual and reproductive health on behalf of a general practitioner in all areas of Australia.

Recommendation 10

4.187 The Committee recommends that, as a priority, State and Territory Governments provide further funding so that all women being treated for gynaecological cancers have access, based on need, to clinical psychologists or psychosexual counsellors.

Commonwealth Government Response

The Commonwealth Government supports this recommendation, noting it is a state and territory government responsibility.

Recommendation 11

4.188 The Committee recommends that Commonwealth, State and Territory Governments work collaboratively to ensure adequate funding for health and support programs in rural and remote areas, such as increased funding for specialist outreach clinics and for the use of modern telecommunications technologies.

Commonwealth Government Response

While the provision of health and support services in rural and remote areas is predominantly a state/territory responsibility, the Commonwealth Government provides additional assistance to rural areas through a range of workforce and health care access programs including: the Medical Specialist Outreach Assistance Program, the Advanced Specialist Training Posts in Rural Areas Program, the Rural Advanced Specialist Trainee Support Program and e-Health initiatives.

Recommendation 12

4.189 The Committee recommends that the Council of Australian Governments, as a matter of urgency, improve the current patient travel assistance arrangements in order to:

• establish equity and standardisation of benefits;
• ensure portability of benefits across jurisdictions; and
• increase the level of benefits to better reflect the real costs of travel and accommodation.

Commonwealth Government Response

Implementation of this recommendation is the responsibility of the state and territory governments. On 1 January 1987, responsibility for the provision of the Isolated Patient Travel and Accommodation Assistance Scheme (IPTAAS) - with funding - was transferred from the Commonwealth Government to the states and territories.

States and territories are best placed to develop and administer flexible and effective measures for those in need, having regard to their own distribution of specialist services and the specific needs of their rural population.

Recommendation 13

4.190 The Committee recommends that the Commonwealth Government consider a Medicare Item Number for lymphoedema treatment by accredited physiotherapists and the provision of subsidised lymphoedema compression garments, based on need, for women as a result of cancer treatment.

Commonwealth Government Response

The Commonwealth Government supports people with chronic conditions and complex care needs to access physiotherapy services through MBS item 10960 which allows up to five allied health services per patient each calendar year.

People with private health insurance may also be eligible for assistance through their insurance.

The provision of medical aids, such as compression garments, is generally the responsibility of the States and Territories.

Recommendation 14

4.191 The Committee recommends that the Commonwealth Government through the Medical Services Advisory Council (MSAC), review the MSAC's decisions on the use of liquid-based cytology (LBC) and high risk human papilloma virus (HPV) DNA testing in cervical screening processes.

Commonwealth Government Response

The Medical Services Advisory Committee (MSAC) has completed assessments for liquid based cytology for cervical screening and human papilloma virus testing in women with cytological prediction of low-grade abnormality and found in both cases that there was insufficient evidence to support public funding at the time of the assessment.

In the event that further evidence is made available regarding liquid based cytology for cervical screening, the MSAC will reconsider this technology. MSAC is currently reviewing the use of human papilloma virus DNA testing for triage of pap smears.

Recommendation 15

4.192 The Committee recommends that the Commonwealth Department of Health and Ageing, as a priority, develop national strategies surrounding HPV vaccines and testing. Specifically, targeted and customised strategies to:

• highlight the benefits of HPV vaccines;
• provide easy access to the vaccines and appropriate educational resources, particularly for Indigenous Australians and people from culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds; and
• develop and encourage the use of self-testing for high risk HPV.

Commonwealth Government Response

The Commonwealth Government agrees that national strategies should be developed on HPV vaccines and testing.

On 29 November 2006, the Commonwealth Government announced funding for a national HPV vaccination program to commence in 2007 under the National Immunisation Program. The program will provide vaccines for females between 12 and 26 years of age. As part of implementation of this program, a comprehensive communication strategy will be developed.

As HPV vaccine does not protect against all cancer-causing HPV strains, nor is it effective in women already exposed to the virus, vaccinated women must continue to have regular Pap smears.

The Commonwealth Government working with the Screening Subcommittee of the Australian Population Health Development Principal Committee have developed a National policy for screening women vaccinated against HPV for the National Cervical Screening Program to provide information to health professionals and to provide a basis for the development of communication materials for women.

There is currently insufficient evidence to support the development of self-testing for high risk HPV.

Recommendation 16

4.193 The Committee recommends that the Commonwealth Government, in collaboration with Cancer Australia and the Centre for Gynaecological Cancers, develop strategies and targets to improve referral rates from general practitioners to gynaecological oncologists for women with ovarian cancer.

Commonwealth Government Response

Clinical practice guidelines for the management of women with epithelial ovarian cancer were developed by the Australian Cancer Network and the National Breast Cancer Centre and have been approved by the NHMRC. The guidelines recommend if an ovarian malignancy is suspected that direct referral to a gynaecological oncology unit is the preferred option. These guidelines have been widely distributed. The Government will ask relevant organisations to continue to promote these guidelines to the medical profession.

Recommendation 17

4.194 The Committee recommends that the Commonwealth Government, as a priority, assume responsibility for the funding, development and implementation of a national data collection and management system to ensure the appropriate and accurate collection of gynaecological cancer data.

Commonwealth Government Response

National data collections of gynaecological cancer cover incidence (from state and territory cancer registries where both the demographic and cancer data items are collected consistently to national and international data standards), mortality, and hospital inpatient admissions for all hospitals in Australia.

Cancer Australia will work with the Australasian Association of Cancer Registries and the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare to consider options for improving data collection and management.

Recommendation 18

4.195 The Committee recommends that the Commonwealth Government in conjunction with the State and Territory Governments to expand the roles and responsibilities of specialist breast cancer nurses to include gynaecological cancers through cooperation with multidisciplinary gynaecological cancer centres.

Commonwealth Government Response

Definition of the roles and responsibilities of health professions is the responsibility of the state and territory governments and professional organisations. The Commonwealth Government currently provides assistance in addition to that of the jurisdictions through the Supporting Women in Rural Areas Diagnosed with Breast Cancer (SWRDBC) initiative. This initiative currently provides $4 million over four years up to 30 June 2007. On 2 January 2007, the Government announced a further four years of funding to target women in rural and remote areas who have been diagnosed with breast cancer.

Recommendation 19

4.196 The Committee recommends that the Commonwealth Government explore the need for Medicare rebates for MRI scans of pelvic, abdominal and breast areas.

Commonwealth Government Response

The Commonwealth Government provides Medicare rebates for MRI scans of the pelvis (and abdomen) for staging cervical cancer at FIGO stages 1B or greater. The Medical Services Advisory Committee (MSAC) is currently considering MRI for women at a high risk of developing breast cancer. The Commonwealth Government will support further reviews by MSAC where the evidence supports it.

Recommendation 20

4.197 The Committee recommends that Commonwealth, State and Territory Governments commit urgently needed funding and increased specialist resources to reduce current waiting times for women seeking the services of gynaecological oncologists and their multidisciplinary teams.

4.198 The Committee further recommends that maximum surgery waiting times are defined by key performance indicators agreed by treating physicians as not putting patients at risk.

Commonwealth Government Response

The funding and supply of specialist services is a responsibility of the state and territory governments.

Recommendation 21

5.103 The Committee recommends that an urgent review of the adequacy and provision of information to medical and allied health professionals about gynaecological cancers be undertaken by the Centre for Gynaecological Cancers.

5.104 The Committee further recommends that the gynaecological oncology medical and allied health communities, through the Centre for Gynaecological Cancers, have gre

Jeannie Ferris (SA, Liberal Party) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source

I seek leave to move a motion in relation to the document.

Leave granted.

I move:

That the Senate take note of the document.

I want to say how much I welcome the government’s response to this report and its careful consideration of our 34 recommendations. Right at the start I would like to say that this is a very clear example of Senate women coming together to work on an issue. All of us saw this issue as being above party politics, an issue important to all women in Australia and their families, including their husbands, their brothers, their fathers and their children. For the first time that I can remember, committee members, under the careful chairmanship of Senator Gary Humphries, were able to come together and, with the aid of some expert advice from some of our very highly trained gynaecological oncologists, put together a report which identified, perhaps for the very first time, some of the gaps in the opportunities for information to be given to the women suffering from breast cancer who have not had their own organisation to cope with the difficulties of gynaecological cancers.

I would also like to say at the outset that the work that Helen Zorbas and the National Breast Cancer Centre have done in taking care of this issue since the year 2000 has been absolutely fundamental to and instrumental in making sure that the work done in Australia has been done to the best effect possible. However, I was disturbed to see this week, Natural Ovarian Cancer Awareness Week, that in fact large numbers of women still do not understand that Pap smears will not identify ovarian cancer. There are many tests available for various forms of cancer but, unfortunately, research teams, both here and overseas, have still not found an early warning test for ovarian cancer and, as a result of that, more than a thousand women are diagnosed every year with it.

I think that more than anything this report is an indication that when there was a serious women’s health issue and all of us realised that all of our women—never mind what they might do every three years at the ballot box—wanted it dealt with and wanted expert advice and wanted to have a voice, we all got together. That is why we called our report Breaking the silence, because we believed that it was time to break the silence on this issue.

I would like to acknowledge the government’s commitment to establishing a national centre for gynaecological cancers under the governance of Cancer Australia. This is of course what the committee strongly recommended. We wanted to provide a national focus for gynaecological issues and, importantly, to increase the education and awareness of medical and allied health professionals. I think I also speak for other members of the committee when I say that we could not have done this work without people of the eminence of Professor Neville Hacker, the Director of the Gynaecological Cancer Centre at the Royal Hospital for Women in Sydney, who gave freely of his time and acted as a mentor to all of us. Getting across this issue was not easy—it is quite technical; some of the medical material is quite difficult—but he was always available and always patient. I know he helped all of us, so I would like to acknowledge him and some of the members of his gynaecological oncology team.

The issue of education in this particular area, of both women and the broader community, was a recurring theme during the inquiry, with many submissions and witnesses telling the committee that a targeted approach was needed to deliver information. I also welcome the announcement that, as we recommended, the government will provide a million dollars in seed funding to support the establishment and initial operation of the centre. That is in addition to the nearly $13.6 million over the six years to 2009 that the government has invested in programs for women’s cancers, over half of which has been used to deliver breast and ovarian cancer programs through the National Breast Cancer Centre, through Helen Zorbas and her talented team.

The NBCC has a vital and highly regarded role that is being played in the absence of anything else that is available for us in the gynaecological cancer area. But increasingly we were consistently told in evidence that when women are looking for information on ovarian cancer or any of the other gynaecological cancers they do not automatically understand that they need to go to the NBCC. Now we will have a dedicated area and for the first time we will actually be able to direct them to a specific site. I know, from all the work that they have been doing, that Helen and her people will work closely with the new gynaecological cancer centre and Cancer Australia to make sure that we deliver the fantastic service that they already deliver on breast cancer.

I would also like to thank Tony Abbott. He can relax now; I will stop pestering him. I must say that, right from the start, Tony was receptive to our position. He was patient in understanding where we were coming from. I think that one of the issues that really swung it for us was the fact that every single gynaecological oncologist in Australia argued together as a body to implement this national centre. Not only were the women together; the gynaecological oncologists were together. I congratulate Tony and his department for the way in which they have been receptive to these recommendations.

Claire Moore (Queensland, Australian Labor Party) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source

I also wish to make some comments on the government response. I welcome the government’s response to our inquiry into gynaecological cancer, and I also note that the government response came in a very timely fashion—within a six-month period. In my short time here, I think that is unprecedented. Also unprecedented is a government response which has been so largely positive to the 34 recommendations the committee put forward. Some of that must be brought home to the amazing efforts of Senator Jeannie Ferris. She said in her contribution that she was going to cease bothering the minister. I think the senator could be misleading the Senate with that particular statement. I hope she is, because I think that her passionate support of the women who are working through this process, their families and the extraordinarily talented and dedicated professionals who work in this area, and her particular method of bothering the minister have been instrumental in making sure that the government response has come forward.

We had no recommendation rejected by the government, amazingly enough. We referred several recommendations back to the states and territories—quite rightly, I think, because so much of the health and education process and the involvement of people in their health journeys must be a cooperative response between the patients, families, medical practitioners and governments at both state and federal levels. In many ways, that was the message of this particular inquiry: people must work together, because the only way that we will achieve what we hope to achieve in this area is for governments to work together and for us to be genuinely woman-focused—because this particular form of cancer is a woman’s cancer.

In many ways the response today is a testament to the extraordinary women who gave of their time and experience and came forward with their evidence to our committee. They also came forward with their expectations, because they told us that they expected their governments to respond. Now we have a level of response at the first round from the government and I say, ‘Come forward, Cancer Australia.’ More than half of the recommendations refer to the actions we must now take with the effective implementation of Cancer Australia. We know that can occur, but we will be watching. Indeed, there must be a focus on hearing people’s voices on their treatment and on ensuring that there are effective research dollars given. We now must work together so that the horror of gynaecological cancer is faced, identified, researched and cured. That outcome can be achieved.

I think that as a parliament we must now ensure that the work that has been put forward is fulfilled. I know that there is goodwill. There were a number of recommendations on combining services and putting forward effective research. It came out consistently that the research dollars available in this area had not reflected the need. We will now have a focus for our efforts: there will be a centre whose major activity will be around issues to do with gynaecological cancer—those issues will no longer be lost or dismissed amidst all the other arguments that come forward when we talk about cancer in our community—and it will work within the auspices of Cancer Australia. We have the expectation that this will succeed. We will work together to ensure it will be done and we will be able to look to the women who came forward and say, ‘We’ve heard you. Your voices have been heard and there will be a move forward.’

I will be talking later tonight about National Ovarian Cancer Awareness Week, which is this week, and Senator Ferris mentioned the importance of awareness and education. I want to place on the record, because I promised them that I would, my support for the women from the Lymphedema Network. I think there is much more work to be done in that area. I believe that the government response, which looks at a limited number of treatments being covered by Medicare, does not go far enough. But we will be able to continue the pressure to ensure that we can go forward. As Senator Ferris quite rightly said, this is a start. We have the process to move forward.

I want to congratulate again the women who made sure that this inquiry occurred, because it was not something that was rushed out in the agenda. It took pressure and also the work of Senator Lyn Allison—

Jeannie Ferris (SA, Liberal Party) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source

Hear, hear!

Claire Moore (Queensland, Australian Labor Party) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source

with her roundtable of women from Victoria. Those women need to be acknowledged. I think the voices of Margaret Heffernan and her supporters need to be acknowledged. Once again, this is not the end. We have had the government response. There were 34 recommendations and not one was rejected. I would like to have that on record over and over again. There is money—$1 million in seed funding. I have to admit that, when the committee was meeting on this issue, we wondered whether in fact we would be able to achieve that, but it has been achieved. We have it in black and white: the government accepts this recommendation of $1 million of seed funding money. Through the processes of this place we will be making sure that the money is spent well, that Cancer Australia maintains the activity that it began quite recently and that the women of Australia will be feeling more confident when they have this issue brought before them.

Lyn Allison (Victoria, Australian Democrats) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source

I am also very pleased having seen this response to our report. I cannot recall seeing a government response which has been so accepting of recommendations. I congratulate the government on its response and, again, say how pleased I am. It was a great honour for me to be a part of this process. A great deal has already been said about the women who were involved both in the parliament and beyond. This response sends an important message to people that signing a petition can make a difference. It has often bothered me, in fact, that so many petitions do not go on to be investigated and looked at in detail, but this one did and I thank the Senate for its indulgence in doing that and the committee itself for accepting that petition and for taking action on it.

This is a huge step forward for women’s health. As I said, it is a great credit to the many women who have been involved in the process. This is a hidden and very life-threatening set of cancers. It is a very important step forward. Of course, the first recommendation—the most important, in my view—was to set up a centre for gynaecological cancers within the auspices of Cancer Australia. That centre will give a national focus to these diseases; it will improve the coordination of existing health, medical and support services, and community projects. What we are really asking is for this very serious condition to have a national focus, to have attention paid to it, in much the same way as breast cancer does. Throughout this inquiry we were constantly made aware of the great success in the testing and treatment of breast cancer and the terrific work that has been done in the past on that. This will hopefully save lives. This will make the lives of many women much better and allow them to cope with their disease more adequately. As I said, the most important thing is that it will save lives. We can be proud of that. Of course, we cannot know how many lives will be saved—we will never know that, but that is what we are here for.

I also pay great respect to Senator Jeannie Ferris, whose role in this inquiry was inspiring for us all. We were touched by what she was going through at the time. Her role in the inquiry process was a brave and difficult one—we all understood that at various times—but, nonetheless, I do not think we could have done it without Senator Ferris. I thank her for those efforts.

The government should be on notice that we will not put this away and forget about it. We will be following up all of the recommendations and will ask the questions. Has it happened? When are we going to see some results from this? So our work is not yet done. Senator Moore, Senator Ferris and others, we need to press on. As has been said, there are some areas where recommendations have perhaps been shifted to the states, and we might need to add some pressure to the states and the federal government to coordinate those efforts. One of those areas concerns women who travel great distances to have cancer treatments and often have very long periods of time when lymphedema very significantly affects their lives. That is a bit of unfinished business, and I make a commitment here and now that we will still be on that case. I thank the government for their response. We really look forward to watching how Cancer Australia handles this and, hopefully, we will have a vibrant and effective centre of excellence for gynaecological cancers as a result. I seek leave to continue my remarks.

Leave granted; debate adjourned.