Senate debates

Wednesday, 3 September 2008

Questions without Notice

Unemployment

2:13 pm

Photo of Guy BarnettGuy Barnett (Tasmania, Liberal Party) Share this | | Hansard source

Before asking the question, I likewise concur and associate myself with the statements made by Senator Evans and other senators in the chamber. My question is to the Minister for Innovation, Industry, Science and Research, Senator Carr. How many jobs have been lost in the Australian textile, clothing and footwear sector since the election of the Rudd Labor government? I ask that question in the context of being fully aware of the minister’s previous response to the question from Senator Ryan, noting his reference to the ABS statistics and noting in particular that his leader and the Labor Party prior to the election used the words ‘no more blame game’. I alert the minister to that comment ‘no more blame game’ and ask him to take that into account when he answers this question. I ask him to specifically refer to the number of jobs lost in the Australian textile, clothing and footwear sector since the Rudd Labor government was elected.

Photo of Kim CarrKim Carr (Victoria, Australian Labor Party, Minister for Innovation, Industry, Science and Research) Share this | | Hansard source

I thank Senator Barnett for his question. I would take Senator Barnett’s and the opposition’s concerns about the welfare of textile workers more seriously if the opposition had actually indicated any interest whatsoever—ever—in the Australian textile industry. I would take their concerns so much more seriously if they had shown any real commitment to workers in this industry. I would take their concerns so much more seriously if they had not sought to introduce changes to the industrial relations regime in this country which sought to undermine the living conditions of textile workers in this country. I would take their concerns so much more seriously if they had just once raised the issue of the welfare of textile workers.

What we have seen is that this government’s approach has been entirely different. We acknowledge that this is an industry that is in the process of transformation. We acknowledge that this is an industry that has highly competitive and highly innovative components to it. We acknowledge the importance of this industry, and that is why, on coming to office, we immediately established a comprehensive review into the textile, clothing and footwear industry. That is why we appointed Professor Roy Green, Dean of the Macquarie Graduate School of Management, who has completed his independent review and has provided that to the government. The government will be considering that report and responding to it in due course.

Like Professor Green, I have an optimistic view of the future of Australia’s TCF industries. Many within the TCF industries are very positive indeed about their future. It was reported in the Financial Review of 1 September 2008, for example, that:

Today’s TCF industry survivors are epitomised by the likes of RM Williams, which sells locally-made boots for up to $1875, Melba Textiles, with its bullet-resistant fabrics used by police, and Clear Edge Filtration, a leading fabric supplier to alumina refineries.

Businesses are flourishing by transforming themselves and taking advantage of the technologies that are available at the moment. The Rudd government’s view is that this is an industry that is very much part of the 21st century industrial landscape and that is very much part of our innovation policies and our industry policies. It would be so much better if the opposition came on board with these policies rather than seeking to take opportunistic advantage of a situation which we have seen in recent times. Everyone understands the global pressures that are being faced by manufacturing in this country, but the difference we have now is a government committed to ensuring that a sustainable industry exists in this country. What we now have is a government that is committed to an innovation policy, to an industry policy aimed at ensuring that workers are able to look forward with confidence to the future.

What we have is a major challenge facing Australian manufacturing. What we believe is that, with the right policy settings and working in partnership with industry, we can come through these challenges in a much stronger state. We propose that one should be optimistic about the future. We do not take the view of the opposition that one should talk down—

Photo of Eric AbetzEric Abetz (Tasmania, Liberal Party, Deputy Leader of the Opposition in the Senate) Share this | | Hansard source

Mr President, on a point of order: once again, the minister has been given over 3½ minutes to try to answer a question which was very simple—how many job losses have there been in the textile, clothing and footwear sector? I understand that you are constrained by standing orders, Mr President, but I would invite you to remind him of the question so that he can answer it in the remaining 30 seconds.

Photo of Joe LudwigJoe Ludwig (Queensland, Australian Labor Party, Manager of Government Business in the Senate) Share this | | Hansard source

Mr President, on the point of order: as Senator Abetz has signalled, he is constrained by the standing orders. I would humbly submit that Senator Carr is answering the question. He is relevant to the question, and he has been answering that, as Senator Abetz correctly points out, for 3½ minutes. I would humbly ask you to rule that there is no point of order.

Photo of John HoggJohn Hogg (President) Share this | | Hansard source

Senator Abetz, once again there is no point of order. I remind the minister of the question that was asked of him and ask him to address that question in the remaining 11 seconds.

Photo of Kim CarrKim Carr (Victoria, Australian Labor Party, Minister for Innovation, Industry, Science and Research) Share this | | Hansard source

The Australian textile industry has a bright future. What needs to occur is new investment, as we have seen in the carpet-making section of this industry, where we have seen, for instance, Victoria Carpets— (Time expired)

Photo of Guy BarnettGuy Barnett (Tasmania, Liberal Party) Share this | | Hansard source

Mr President, I ask a supplementary question, notwithstanding the minister’s blatant disregard for his refusal to answer my earlier question. Firstly, is the review that was referred to by Senator Carr in his answer to my first question in addition to the 130-odd reviews that have been undertaken by the Rudd Labor government since the election or is it part of that number? Secondly, is the minister aware of union calls for a crisis meeting to address the jobs in the textile, clothing and footwear sectors? Thirdly, does the government plan to put in place a short-term assistance package for the Australian textile, clothing and footwear sector, which is haemorrhaging jobs under the Rudd Labor government?

Government Senators:

Government senators interjecting

Photo of John HoggJohn Hogg (President) Share this | | Hansard source

Order! Before I call Senator Carr, I remind those on my right that the questioner is entitled to be heard by everyone in the chamber.

Photo of Kim CarrKim Carr (Victoria, Australian Labor Party, Minister for Innovation, Industry, Science and Research) Share this | | Hansard source

The Australian government is a strong supporter of the Australian TCF industry and the many thousands of hardworking Australians that it employs. I understand that some of these hardworking workers have made a trip to Canberra today. And Professor Green, I remind Senator Barnett, has completed his review of the TCF industries in Australia and reported to me last week. The TCFUA has launched its Make it Well, Make it Fair, Make it Here campaign to support its submission to Professor Green’s review. This government appreciates the value of hardworking TCF workers and the contribution that they make to the Australian economy. I can assure the Senate that we will take their interests into account in developing the Australian government’s response to Professor Green’s review.