Senate debates
Wednesday, 23 June 2010
Committees
Selection of Bills Committee; Report
4:00 pm
Kerry O'Brien (Tasmania, Australian Labor Party) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
I present the 9th report of 2010 of the Selection of Bills Committee.
Ordered that the report be adopted.
I seek leave to have the report incorporated in Hansard.
Leave granted.
The report read as follows
SELECTION OF BILLS COMMITTEE
REPORT NO. 9 OF 2010
- (1)
- The committee met in private session on Tuesday, 22 June 2010 at 4.48 pm.
- (2)
- The committee resolved to recommend—That—
- (a)
- the Banking Amendment (Delivering Essential Financial Services for the Community) Bill 2010 be referred immediately to the Economics Legislation Committee for inquiry and report by 2 September 2010 (see appendices 1 and 2 for statements of reasons for referral) ;
- (b)
- the provisions of the Civil Dispute Resolution Bill 2010 be referred immediately to the Legal and Constitutional Affairs Legislation Committee for inquiry and report by 30 July 2010 (see appendices 3 and 4 for statements of reasons for referral); and
- (c)
- the provisions of the Corporations Amendment (Sons of Gwalia) Bill 2010 be referred immediately to the Legal and Constitutional Affairs Legislation Committee for inquiry and report by 24 August 2010 (see appendix 5 for a statement of reasons for referral).
- (3)
- The committee resolved to recommend—That the following bills not be referred to committees:
- Health Insurance Amendment (Professional Services Review) Bill 2010
- International Monetary Agreements Amendment Bill (No. 1) 2010
- Radiocommunications Amendment Bill 2010
- Service and Execution of Process Amendment (Interstate Fine Enforcement) Bill 2010
- Tradex Scheme Amendment Bill 2010
- Water Efficiency Labelling and Standards Amendment Bill 2010.
The committee recommends accordingly.
- (4)
- The committee considered the Preventing the Misuse of Government Advertising Bill 2010 and noted that the Senate had agreed to refer the provisions of the bill to the Finance and Public Administration Legislation Committee for inquiry and report.
- (5)
- The committee deferred consideration of the Commonwealth Commissioner for Children and Young People Bill 2010 to its next meeting.
(Kerry O’Brien)
Chair
23 June 2010
APPENDIX 1
SELECTION OF BILLS COMMITTEE
Proposal to refer a bill to a committee
Name of bill:
Banking Amendment (Delivering Essential Financial Services for the Community) Bill 2010
Reasons for referral/principal issues for consideration:
To consider the impact of this legislation on consumers and their ability to access suitable financial services
To consider the impact of this Bill on banking operations and competition in the financial services sector
Possible submissions or evidence from:
Abacus Australian Mutuals
Australian Bankers Association
Australian Financial Markets Association Choice
Consumer Action Law Centre
Committee to which bill is to be referred:
Senate Standing Committee on Economics
Possible hearing date(s):
To be determined by the Committee
Possible reporting date:
2 September 2010
(signed)
Whip / Selection of Bills Committee member
APPENDIX 2
SELECTION OF BILLS COMMITTEE
Proposal to refer a bill to a committee
Name of bill:
Banking Amendment (Delivering Essential Financial Services for the Community) Bill 2010
Reasons for referral/principal issues for consideration:
Possible submissions or evidence from:
Australia Institute (David Richardson)
Brotherhood of St Laurence (Gerard Brody)
Consumer Credit Legal Centre
Good Shepherd Youth and Family Service
Financial and Consumer Rights Centre (Richard Foster)
Australian Council of Social Services
Committee to which bill is to be referred:
Senate Economics Legislation Committee
Possible hearing date(s):
Possible reporting date:
2 September
(signed)
Whip / Selection of Bills Committee member
APPENDIX 3
SELECTION OF BILLS COMMITTEE
Proposal to refer a bill to a committee
Name of bill:
Civil Dispute Resolution Bill 2010
Reasons for referral/principal issues for consideration:
- Whether the obligation to “assist” in clause 9 of the Bill creates potential conflicts in the lawyer/client relationship, particularly in circumstances when a client does not accept advice to engage in “genuine steps” and issues contrary instructions; and
- Whether the provisions in clause 12 amount to an abrogation of settlement privilege and the extent to which additional safeguards may be required.
Possible submissions or evidence from:
Attorney-General’s Department, Law Council of Australia.
Committee to which bill is to be referred:
Legal and Constitutional Affairs Legislation
Possible hearing date(s):
Possible reporting date:
30 July 2010
Stephen Parry
(signed)
Whip/ Selection of Bills Committee member
APPENDIX 4
SELECTION OF BILLS COMMITTEE
Proposal to refer a bill to a committee
Name of bill:
Civil Dispute Resolution Bill 2010
Reasons for referral/principal issues for consideration:
- Need to assess the extent to which the new obligation requiring a ‘genuine steps statement’ to be filed in Federal Courts, which the Magistrate may take into account when awarding costs, will deter pursuit of justice or facilitate efficiency
- Need to assess the extent to which this new obligation will have an impact on the already chronically under-funded legal support services -given that the preparation of this ‘genuine steps statement’ adds an additional step to the legal process, particularly onerous to people from non-English speaking backgrounds.
Possible submissions or evidence from:
Australian Law Council
Federation of Community Legal Services
Liberty Victoria
Human Rights Law Resource Centre Ltd
Public Interest Law Clearing House (VIC) Inc
Committee to which bill is to be referred:
Legal and Constitutional
Possible hearing date(s):
August
Possible reporting date:
21 September 2010
Rachel Siewert
(signed)
Whip/ Selection of Bills Committee member
APPENDIX 5
SELECTION OF BILLS COMMITTEE
Proposal to refer a bill to a committee
Name of bill:
Corporations Amendment (Sons of Gwalia) Bill 2010
Reasons for referral/principal issues for consideration:
Despite this Bill already being considered by the Selection of Bills Committee, there has been a technical legal point raised regarding the broader legal implications of subordinating compensation claims where the claimant is also a shareholder. As a result, the additional information raised means that the legislation would benefit from the senate inquiry process and the opportunity to gather wider legal opinion.
The principal issues for consideration are:
- To consider the legal implications of subordinating compensation claims behind unsecured creditors in the event of a company winding up, and where the party making those claims is also a shareholder;
- To consider the broader impact of the legislation on shareholders and creditors during the winding up process.
Possible submissions or evidence from:
- Law Council of Australia,
- Chartered Secretaries of Australia,
- Australian Financial Markets Association,
- Insolvency Practitioners of Australia,
- Law Institute of Victoria,
- Australian Institute of Company Directors
Committee to which bill is to be referred:
Senate Standing Committee on Legal and Constitutional Affairs
Possible hearing date(s):
To be determined by the Committee
Possible reporting date:
24 September 2010
Stephen Parry
(signed)
Whip/ Selection of Bills Committee member