Senate debates
Monday, 21 March 2011
Notices
Presentation
Senator Milne to move on the next day of sitting:
- That the following matters be referred to the Rural Affairs and Transport References Committee for inquiry and report by 8 April 2011:
- (a)
- the science underpinning the technical assumption that Apis cerana, the Asian honey bee, cannot be eradicated in Australia;
- (b)
- the science underpinning the assumption that the Asian honey bee will not spread throughout Australia;
- (c)
- the science relating to the impacts of the spread of the Asian honey bee on biodiversity, pollination and the European honey bee; and
- (d)
- the cost benefit of eradication of the Asian honey bee.
Senator Hanson-Young to move on the next day of sitting:
- That the Senate—
- (a)
- notes that:
- (i)
- women make up only 25 per cent of board appointments in Australia, and
- (ii)
- of that figure, only 10 per cent of the Australian Stock Exchange 200 companies have female directors, and only 8 per cent have female executives;
- (b)
- recognises that:
- (i)
- women in the workforce face many issues, including pay equity, the impact of unpaid work and family responsibilities on their careers and the disparity in retirement savings, and
- (ii)
- improving the levels of female leadership in corporate Australia will help to drive change in all of these areas; and
- (c)
- calls on cross-party support to take the lead and phase in meaningful quotas in boardrooms around Australia.
Senator Cormann to move on the next day of sitting:
- That the Senate—
- (a)
- notes the Government’s failure to keep its promise to hold a tax summit by 30 June 2011;
- (b)
- considers that any genuine tax summit will properly review and report on Labor’s proposals to introduce a national mining tax and a carbon tax; and
- (c)
- decides that no legislation to impose a national mining tax or a carbon tax be considered by the Senate until after the October tax summit has reported.
Senator Carol Brown to move on the next day of sitting:
- That the Joint Standing Committee on Electoral Matters be authorised to hold a public meeting during the sitting of the Senate on Wednesday, 23 March 2011, from 9.30 am to 10.45 am, to take evidence for the committee’s inquiry into the conduct of the 2010 Federal Election and matters related thereto.
Senator Cormann to move on the next day of sitting:
- That the Select Committee on the Scrutiny of New Taxes be authorised to hold a public meeting during the sitting of the Senate on Thursday, 24 March 2011, from 10.30 am to 12.30 pm.
Senator Eggleston to move on the next day of sitting:
- That the time for the presentation of the report of the Economics References Committee on the impacts of supermarket price decisions on the dairy industry be extended to 20 April 2011.
Senator Wortley to move on the next day of sitting:
- That the Joint Select Committee on Cyber Safety be authorised to hold a public meeting during the sitting of the Senate on Thursday, 24 March 2011, from 9.30 am to 10.30 am.
Senator Siewert to move on the next day of sitting:
- That the Senate—
- (a)
- notes:
- (i)
- deep sea bottom trawling can be a highly destructive fishing practice causing enormous damage to deep sea corals, rare and unique species, fish populations and sensitive bottom habitats,
- (ii)
- the Senate on 11 October 2006 unanimously endorsed the Australian Government position to put in place measures on protecting high seas biodiversity through proposing a series of bans on high seas bottom trawling,
- (iii)
- in December 2006 the United Nations (UN) called on all fishing nations to ban bottom trawling in vulnerable marine ecosystems, including seamounts, hydrothermal vents and cold water corals until it had been assessed that there will be no significant adverse impacts and that in 2009 the UN General Assembly reinforced the need for environmental impact assessments of bottom fisheries on the high seas and to ensure that vessels do not engage in bottom fishing until such assessments have been carried out,
- (iv)
- Australia has not yet completed scientific environmental assessments for the South Pacific Ocean or the Southern Indian Ocean yet it allows Australian flagged vessels to undertake high seas bottom trawl fishing in these areas, which is in clear contravention of UN resolutions which have been supported by the Australian Government, and
- (v)
- that in 2011 the UN General Assembly will review actions taken by states, including Australia, to protect vulnerable marine ecosystems of the high seas from destructive fishing practices such as bottom trawling;
- (b)
- expresses concern that the Australian Government is failing to implement the bipartisan policy of protecting the biodiversity of the high seas from destructive fishing practices such as bottom trawling; and
- (c)
- urges the Government, as a matter of priority, to:
- (i)
- complete and make public the required scientific assessments for the South Pacific and Southern Indian oceans as a matter of priority,
- (ii)
- put in place a ban on all Australian bottom trawl fishing on seamounts and other vulnerable marine ecosystems until it can be shown scientifically that such fishing will not damage fragile marine ecosystems, and
- (iii)
- advocate and support a complete UN ban on all high seas bottom trawling until thorough scientific and publicly available assessments have been undertaken and appropriate, effective conservation and management objectives are in place.
Senator Ludwig to move on the next day of sitting:
- That the government business orders of the day relating to the National Vocational Education and Training Regulator Bill 2010 [2011] and a related bill, and the National Vocational Education and Training Regulator (Consequential Amendments) Bill 2011 may be taken together for their remaining stages.
Senator Ludwig to move on the next day of sitting:
- That the Wild Rivers (Environmental Management) Bill 2011 be referred to the Legal and Constitutional Affairs Legislation Committee for inquiry and report by 10 May 2011.
Senator Xenophon to move on the next day of sitting:
- That the following matter be referred to the Economics References Committee for inquiry and report by 30 June 2011:
The proposed acquisition of the Australian Stock Exchange (ASX) by Singapore Exchange Limited (SGX), with particular reference to:
- (a)
- whether such an acquisition would be in the national interest;
- (b)
- whether the 15 per cent foreign ownership cap on the ASX is appropriate;
- (c)
- whether the revised proposed composition of the merged board and governance arrangements (as announced on 15 February 2011) are appropriate;
- (d)
- the Government of Singapore’s interest in the SGX and it’s role in the proposed merged entity;
- (e)
- what impact such an acquisition might have on Australia’s ability to attract investment; and
- (f)
- any other related matters.
Senator Bob Brown to move on the next day of sitting:
- That the Senate—
- (a)
- notes the reported Chinese crackdown on democracy advocates in East Turkistan and Tibet following democratic protests in the Middle East; and
- (b)
- asks the Minister for Foreign Affairs (Mr Rudd) to confirm with Chinese authorities:
- (i)
- the substance of the charges leading to the 2007 arrest of Mr Ablikim Abdiriyim, the son of Uighur advocate Ms Rebiya Kadeer,
- (ii)
- whether Mr Abdiriyim has suffered prolonged solitary confinement and torture as reported by Amnesty International late in 2010,
- (iii)
- whether Mr Abdiriyim has recently received medical treatment, and
- (iv)
- when Mr Abdiriyim is due to be released.
4:20 pm
David Feeney (Victoria, Australian Labor Party, Parliamentary Secretary for Defence) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
I give notice that, on the next day of sitting, I shall move:
That the provisions of paragraphs (5) to (8) of standing order 111 not apply to the following bills, allowing them to be considered during this period of sittings:Appropriation Bill (No. 3) 2010-2011Appropriation Bill (No. 4) 2010-2011Family Assistance Legislation Amendment (Child Care Rebate) Bill 2011National Vocational Education and Training Regulator (Consequential Amendments) Bill 2011.
I also table a statement of reasons justifying the need for this bill to be considered during the sittings and seek leave to have the statements incorporated in Hansard.
Leave granted.
The statements read as follows—
APPROPRIATION BILL (No. 3) 2010-2011
APPROPRIATION BILL (No. 4) 2010-2011
Purpose of the Bills
The bills request legislative authority for expenditure to be incurred in respect of 2010-2011.
Reasons for Urgency
Appropriations proposed in the bills provide funding for expenditure that is required to implement decisions and funding adjustments, that involve further expenditure in 2010-11, which have been agreed since the 2010-11 Budget. Passage of the bills before the last day of the 2011 Autumn Sittings will ensure continuity of the Government's programs and the Commonwealth's ability to meet its obligations as they fall due. Should passage not be granted in the 2011 Autumn Sittings, activities to be funded by the bills may be deferred or significantly delayed.
FAMILY ASSISTANCE LEGISLATION AMENDMENT (CHILD CARE REBATE) BILL
Purpose of the Bill
There has been a public commitment by the Government to introduce fortnightly payment of the Child Care Rebate from July 2011.
Reasons for Urgency
The Government made a pre-election commitment to pay the Child Care Rebate fortnightly from July 2011. To give effect to this commitment, amendments to the timing and method of rebate payments must be made to the family assistance legislation.
The Centrelink annual payment cycle for families' entitlements commences on 1 July each financial year and so enacting fortnightly payments from the first week after 1 July 2011 is essential for ease of administration for families, child care services and Centrelink. Passage of the bill in the 2011 Autumn sittings will ensure that the July 2011 commencement date can be met.
————
NATIONAL VOCATIONAL EDUCATION AND TRAINING REGULATOR (CONSEQUENTIAL AMENDMENTS) BILL
Purpose of the Bill
On 7 December 2009 the Council of Australian Governments (COAG) agreed to the creation of the National Vocational Education and Training (VET) Regulator (NVR) and Standards Council. The NVR will assist in ensuring that skills development in Australia is delivered through a high quality training system. By underpinning the quality of the system it will allow employers and students to be confident about the outcomes of the training they receive.
The National Vocational Education and Training Regulator Bill 2010 and the National Vocational Education and Training Regulator (Transitional Provisions) Bill 2010, which were introduced into the Senate on 26 November 2010, will form a new statutory authority with responsibilities and powers for the registration and audit of registered training organisations (RTOs) that operate in multiple jurisdictions, train international students, or operate in the territories or one of the referring states and accreditation of courses in the VET sector. The bills will also strengthen mechanisms for the monitoring and enforcement of the regulatory framework.
The National Vocational Education and Training Regulator (Consequential Amendments) Bill 2011 is essential to ensure that the new regulatory framework interacts properly with other regulatory frameworks and funding programs, including the Education Services for Overseas Students Act 2000 and the VET FEE-Help component of the Higher Education Support Act 2003.
Reasons for Urgency
The package of bills establishing the NVR and ensuring that the new regulatory framework interacts properly with other regulatory frameworks and funding programs are:
- the National Vocational Education and Training Regulator Bill 2010 and the National Vocational Education and Training Regulator (Transitional Provisions) Bill 2010, which were introduced in the Senate on 26 November 2010; and
- the National Vocational Education and Training Regulator (Consequential Amendments) Bill 2011.
The Budget announcement regarding the NVR indicated that the regulator would commence regulatory operations in April 2011. In order to meet this start date it is important that the package of bills to establish the NVR and ensure that the new regulatory framework interacts properly with other regulatory frameworks and funding programs is passed during the Autumn sittings.
Timely passage of these bills is important to support:
- referral and mirroring by the states
- appointment of senior officers of the new agency
- considered transfer of staff and processes from the state and territory regulators to the new agency, and
- the reputation of Australia's international education sector.
Four states have indicated that they will refer powers to the Commonwealth to support the establishment of the NVR. Two states, Victoria and Western Australia have indicated they will enact mirroring legislation. The territories also support this proposal. Finalisation of the bills in the Autumn sittings is important as it will facilitate states and territories to make their own legislative arrangements to support the establishment of the NVR.
The bills establish a number of statutory officers and until the legislation passes and the commencement of the NVR is assured, it will not be possible to recruit senior officers.
Given that a range of regulatory functions will transfer from state and territory bodies to the NV2 it is important that detailed transition plans are developed to cover matters including the transfer of staff from state and territory regulators to the NVR and new arrangements for the regulation of RTOs. However, it is difficult to progress these discussions until the bills have been passed and a start date for the NVR confirmed.
The NVR and its strengthened monitoring and enforcement powers are integral to the Government's response to the weaknesses that have been identified in regulation under both the Australian Qualifications and Training Framework and the regulatory framework for international education.
The NVR also requires a number of legislative instruments in order to be fully operational. These legislative instruments cannot be laid before the Parliament until after the bills have passed.
Senator McLucas to move on the next day of sitting:
- That, in accordance with section 5 of the Parliament Act 1974, the Senate approves the proposal by the National Capital Authority for capital works within the Parliamentary Zone relating to the installation of artwork known as ‘The Prime Ministers’.