Senate debates
Wednesday, 15 June 2011
Questions on Notice
Taxation (Question No. 428)
Mathias Cormann (WA, Liberal Party, Shadow Assistant Treasurer) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
asked the Minister representing the Treasurer, upon notice, on 10 March 2011:
With reference to Practice Statement Law Administration 2010/4 (Division 7A: trust entitlements):
(1) What is the policy intention of the proposed measure.
(2) How does the proposed measure enable the policy intention to be achieved.
(3) Is the effect of the proposed measure revenue neutral:
(a) if so, how has revenue neutrality been achieved;
(b) have other saving measures been needed to achieve revenue neutrality;
(c) if not, how much revenue is expected to be raised as a result of the measure; and
(d) can the annual numbers for the forward estimates period be provided, and any further information covering the longer term.
(4) Have the likely administrative and compliance costs of implementing the proposed measure been assessed; if so, what are they.
(5) (a) What stakeholders will be directly affected by the measure;
(b) have these stakeholders been involved in consultation prior to and during the development of the measure;
(c) what consultation has the Government been engaged in; and
(d) have independent bodies or experts been involved in the consultation process.
(6) Is this proposed measure a government response to an identified problem; if so, what problem is it addressing.
(7) Were any alternatives considered before this approach was proposed, if so:
(a) can details of those alternatives be provided; and
(b) why was it decided that those options would not be implemented.
(8) Will inaction pose a risk to the integrity of the tax system or broader government administration; if so, how would you rate that risk.
(9) What modelling has been carried out in developing the proposed measure.
(10) Have the broader implications of the implementation of the measure on the economy been forecast; if so, what are they.
(11) Have international comparisons been considered and does the proposed measure accord with international 'best practice'.
Penny Wong (SA, Australian Labor Party, Minister for Finance and Deregulation) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
The Treasurer has provided the following answer to the honourable senator's question:
PSLA 2010/4 is not a proposed measure. This practice statement provides guidance on the administration of Taxation Ruling TR 2010/3. Law Administration Practice Statements are instructions to Australian Taxation Office staff. They provide direction/assistance to staff on the approaches to be taken in performing duties involving the application of the laws administered by the Commissioner. They in no way bind or impact on taxpayers other than making transparent the ATO's approach to matters within their purview. In doing so, they provide taxpayers with guidance on options that may be available to them. The ATO is therefore unable to provide an answer to these questions.