Senate debates
Thursday, 7 February 2013
Questions on Notice
Fair Work Act (Question No. 2527)
Eric Abetz (Tasmania, Liberal Party, Shadow Minister for Employment and Workplace Relations) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
asked the Minister representing the Minister for Employment and Workplace Relations, upon notice, on 6 November 2012:
With reference to the Fair Work Act Review report titled Towards more productive and equitable workplaces, which states that 'The Panel was disinclined to recommend legislative changes where there was a reasonable prospect that judicial interpretation of existing provisions would resolve the problem': can examples be provided where the Review specifically did not consider issues because of a 'reasonable prospect' of judicial interpretation.
Penny Wong (SA, Australian Labor Party, Minister for Finance and Deregulation) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
The Minister for Employment and Workplace Relations has provided the following answer to the honourable senator's question:
After considering certain matters, the Review Panel, in some instances did not make a recommendation for change to the relevant provisions of the Fair Work Act 2009 because there was a reasonable prospect that judicial interpretation of the relevant provisions would develop to resolve matters raised as part of the Review.
Specific examples in the Review Report - Towards more productive and equitable workplaces: An evaluation of the Fair Work legislation - include: