Senate debates
Wednesday, 26 June 2013
Questions without Notice
Science and Research
2:38 pm
Helen Polley (Tasmania, Australian Labor Party) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
My question is to the Minister for Science and Research, Senator Farrell. Can the minister explain to the Senate why the strategic research priorities are important for supporting Australia's ongoing research excellence?
Don Farrell (SA, Australian Labor Party, Minister for Science and Research) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
I thank Senator Polley for her very good question and her ongoing interest in the world-class science research that Australia conducts under this government. Last Friday I joined the Prime Minister, the Chief Scientist and Minister Emerson at the Prime Minister's Science, Engineering and Innovation Council, where we launched the government's strategic research priorities. These strategic research priorities took the place of the national research priorities. This change was foreshadowed in the Australian government's National Research Investment Plan released in November 2012.
There are 15 priorities and they are designed to drive Australia's research investment. The priorities align with the societal changes covering issues of immediate and critical importance to Australia. These challenges addressed the priorities of living in a changed environment, promoting population health and wellbeing, managing food and water assets, securing Australia's place in a changing world and, most importantly, lifting productivity and economic growth.
Senator Abetz interjecting—
I am glad you agree, Senator Abetz. Universities Australia chief executive, Belinda Robertson, welcomed these priorities. She said: 'The priorities provide a focus to support prudent research investment decision making and will help to ensure that the return to the nation on this investment is maximised.' These priorities— (Time expired)
2:40 pm
Helen Polley (Tasmania, Australian Labor Party) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
Mr President, I ask a supplementary question. Can the minister outline how the Gillard government has invested in the science, research and innovation sector to ensure all Australians benefit from our world-class research?
2:41 pm
Don Farrell (SA, Australian Labor Party, Minister for Science and Research) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
I thank Senator Polley for her very insightful supplementary question. Under this government, investment in science, research and innovation has increased by nearly 30 per cent compared with the previous Howard coalition government. In the 2013-14 budget we committed $185 million, over two years, to continue with the National Collaborative Research Infrastructure Strategy, or NCRIS. NCRIS funds projects in support of important research work that will benefit future generations. We have also committed a further $135 million over the next five years to extend the Future Fellowship Scheme, which will provide for 150 more scholarships. The Antarctic Climate and Ecosystems Cooperative Research Centre, based in Hobart, received an extra $25 million over the next five years. We have invested $200 million— (Time expired)
2:42 pm
Helen Polley (Tasmania, Australian Labor Party) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
Mr President, I ask a further supplementary question. Can the minister outline how these investment support our economy and our jobs?
Don Farrell (SA, Australian Labor Party, Minister for Science and Research) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
I thank Senator Polley for another very good supplementary question.
Senator Abetz interjecting—
Yes, well researched, as Senator Abetz said. Our investment in the Hobart based Antarctic CRC will support Tasmanian jobs. The Antarctic sector is very important to the Tasmanian economy and is worth nearly $200 million per year. Around 1,000 people are employed in this sector supporting nearly 100 small and medium enterprises. You may laugh about it, Senator Abetz, but this is very important to the people of Tasmania and it is a good decision for this government to make. Our $100 million investment in the new health and biomedical facility, supporting life-saving research and training for the next generation of healthcare professionals— (Time expired)