Senate debates
Wednesday, 27 August 2014
Questions without Notice
Defence: Submarines
2:00 pm
Penny Wong (SA, Australian Labor Party, Leader of the Opposition in the Senate) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
My question is to the Minister for Defence, Senator Johnston. I refer to the minister's pre-election promise that:
The coalition is committed to building 12 new submarines here in Adelaide.
Is this still the government's position?
David Johnston (WA, Liberal Party, Minister for Defence) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
I thank the senator for what is a very, very important and crucial question for Australia's future strategic defence capacity. Submarines are our most significant and important strategic deterrent. Since the Labor Party gave us the Collins class submarine on the basis that it would be very cheap to maintain and very reliable, we have done nothing more than spend $1 billion a year for one or two submarines being available every year. The point about this is that we do not want to make the same mistakes that the Labor Party has bequeathed to us with submarines.
Submarines are, as I said, extremely important to us and a vital strategic deterrent. For a country like Australia, where a very large percentage of our economic exports are on the water—which must go through three choke points—sea denial is essential. Submarines are absolutely fundamental to our defence capability. We have said, firstly—and these are our promises—that there will be no capability gap between the transition out of the very troubled Collins class—
Claire Moore (Queensland, Australian Labor Party, Shadow Minister for Women) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
Mr President, I rise on a point of order. My point of order is on direct relevance. It was a very specific question. It was about the promise of building 12 new submarines in Adelaide. We would like to have a response to that question.
Stephen Parry (President) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
The minister has been addressing a portion of the question, and I remind the minister of the question. He has 30 seconds to answer the question.
David Johnston (WA, Liberal Party, Minister for Defence) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
We have promised for this vital strategic capability that there will be no capability gap. We will have new—
Opposition senators interjecting—
Doug Cameron (NSW, Australian Labor Party, Shadow Minister for Human Services) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
How about South Australia and South Australian jobs? You are pathetic.
Penny Wong (SA, Australian Labor Party, Leader of the Opposition in the Senate) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
Mr President, I rise on a point of order. The minister has avoided the question for almost the entire time. There was one question only: Is the commitment to build 12 new submarines in Adelaide still the government's position? That is the only question that was asked. He should answer the question and tell South Australians the truth.
Stephen Parry (President) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
Senator Wong, there was a point of order just a short while ago and the minister was barely on his feet when there was a second point of order. The minister has been reminded of the question. The minister has 14 seconds left.
David Johnston (WA, Liberal Party, Minister for Defence) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
This government takes defence seriously. This government has guaranteed no capability gap between the Collins class and—(Time expired)
2:03 pm
Penny Wong (SA, Australian Labor Party, Leader of the Opposition in the Senate) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
Mr President, I ask a supplementary question. I refer the minister to reports in today's Adelaide Advertiser that a secret delegation of Japanese submarine experts has toured the shipbuilder ASC in Adelaide without the knowledge of the South Australian government.
Stephen Parry (President) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
Order on my right—
Senator Conroy interjecting—
and my left.
Penny Wong (SA, Australian Labor Party, Leader of the Opposition in the Senate) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
Mr President, I ask if the clock could be stopped while this—
Government senators interjecting—
Stephen Parry (President) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
Order on my right. Senator Wong, you will be given ample time to ask your question. I will be ignoring the clock.
Penny Wong (SA, Australian Labor Party, Leader of the Opposition in the Senate) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
Will the minister rule out purchasing Japanese submarines for Australia's new submarine fleet?
2:04 pm
David Johnston (WA, Liberal Party, Minister for Defence) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
We were bequeathed two options: son of Collins and a whole new design. When we opened the lid on submarines, as a new government must do, you know what we found in the box? Zero—a round number before one. They had done nothing.
Claire Moore (Queensland, Australian Labor Party, Shadow Minister for Women) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
Mr President, again my point of order is on direct relevance. There was a single question about whether the minister will rule out purchasing Japanese submarines for Australian's new submarine fleet. That was the only question that was asked.
Stephen Parry (President) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
Thank you, Senator Moore. The minister has 25 seconds left to answer the question, and I remind the minister of the question.
David Johnston (WA, Liberal Party, Minister for Defence) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
Not only had they done nothing about submarines; in the forward estimates out to 2030 they had taken $20 billion out of the future submarine program.
Penny Wong (SA, Australian Labor Party, Leader of the Opposition in the Senate) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
Mr President, my point of order is on direct relevance. The question was very simple: Will the minister rule out purchasing Japanese submarines for Australia's new submarine fleet? Yes or no?
Stephen Parry (President) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
Senator Wong, your question had a longer preamble than just that simple statement. The minister has been reminded of the question, and I invite the minister to continue with his answer.
David Johnston (WA, Liberal Party, Minister for Defence) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
There are many options for diesel electric submarine operators: DCNS at Cherbourg in France; TKMS at Kiel in Germany; and—(Time expired)
2:06 pm
Penny Wong (SA, Australian Labor Party, Leader of the Opposition in the Senate) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
Mr President, I ask a further supplementary question. With the Japanese delegation visiting ASC, the foreign minister confirming that the government is in discussions about purchasing submarines from Japan and the minister's refusal today to commit to his pre-election promise, is the government preparing to break its promise to the people of South Australia?
David Johnston (WA, Liberal Party, Minister for Defence) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
May I say that that promise was broken in 2009 by the Labor Party when they did nothing for submarines.
Senator Wong interjecting—
Stephen Parry (President) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
Order, Senator Wong! Minister, you have the call.
David Johnston (WA, Liberal Party, Minister for Defence) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
We have had the pleasure—
Government senators interjecting —
Stephen Parry (President) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
Pause the clock. Order on my right!
David Johnston (WA, Liberal Party, Minister for Defence) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
We have had the honour and privilege of some 14 Japanese technicians visiting South Australia. They will visit Perth, Canberra and Sydney. We recently signed a defence science technology exchange agreement. We have had people from Germany, France, the United States and the UK visit Adelaide, all to exchange technical information with Australia. (Time expired)