Senate debates

Monday, 22 February 2016

Questions without Notice

Taxation

2:11 pm

Photo of Carol BrownCarol Brown (Tasmania, Australian Labor Party, Shadow Parliamentary Secretary for Families and Payments) Share this | | Hansard source

My question is to the Minister representing the Treasurer, Senator Cormann. Does the minister agree with former Liberal Premier Jeff Kennett, who said: 'I'm very disappointed at the way in which my side of politics are arguing against what I think is an eminently supportable concept that's been put forward by the Labor Party in terms of negative gearing'?

2:12 pm

Photo of Mathias CormannMathias Cormann (WA, Liberal Party, Minister for Finance) Share this | | Hansard source

No, we do not agree with our valued friend and colleague, the former Premier of Victoria, in relation to this point. The Labor Party clearly does not like it when police officers, nurses and teachers aspire to get ahead. On this side of parliament we like Middle Australia to aspire to get ahead. We do not believe that to hit them around the head with the sort of ill-thought-out policy that Labor put forward of ramping up taxes, distorting the market, leading to increased costs for rental accommodation—

Opposition Senators:

Opposition senators interjecting

Photo of Mathias CormannMathias Cormann (WA, Liberal Party, Minister for Finance) Share this | | Hansard source

leading to lower property values in terms of established properties is a good policy. We do not think that is a good policy on this side of the parliament. We believe that a good tax policy is one that encourages people to work more, save more and invest more. We believe that a good tax policy is a policy that helps us strengthen growth and create more jobs in a way that is also fair, and that is the policy agenda that this government will continue to pursue.

2:13 pm

Photo of Carol BrownCarol Brown (Tasmania, Australian Labor Party, Shadow Parliamentary Secretary for Families and Payments) Share this | | Hansard source

Mr President, I ask a supplementary question. Does the minister agree with former Treasurer Joe Hockey that 'negative gearing should be skewed towards new housing so that there is an incentive to add to the housing stock rather than an incentive to speculate on existing property'?

Photo of Mathias CormannMathias Cormann (WA, Liberal Party, Minister for Finance) Share this | | Hansard source

No.

Opposition Senators:

Opposition senators interjecting

Photo of Stephen ParryStephen Parry (President) Share this | | Hansard source

Order on my left!

Government senators interjecting

And my right!

Honourable senators interjecting

On both sides!

Senator Cameron interjecting

Senator Cameron!

Senator Ian Macdonald interjecting

Senator Macdonald!

Senator Conroy interjecting

Senator Conroy!

Government senators interjecting

On my right!

2:14 pm

Photo of Carol BrownCarol Brown (Tasmania, Australian Labor Party, Shadow Parliamentary Secretary for Families and Payments) Share this | | Hansard source

Thank you, Mr President. For a moment there I thought I was at the Press Club. Mr President, I ask a supplementary question. Does the minister agree with the coalition-appointed chair of the Financial Systems Inquiry, Mr David Murray, that reducing the concessions for negative gearing 'would lead to a more efficient allocation of funding in the economy'? When even the government's Liberal mates agree with Labor's policies, why won't the government?

Photo of Mathias CormannMathias Cormann (WA, Liberal Party, Minister for Finance) Share this | | Hansard source

I do not agree that David Murray endorsed Labor's policy on negative gearing, so I reject the premise of the question. What I would say is that this government will continue to assess the tax system as a whole for opportunities to make our tax system more growth friendly so that we can strengthen growth and create more jobs in a way that is fair. Obviously, as we do in the lead-up to any budget, we will be considering all of the information, assessing all of the options and making judgments on what is in the national interest. Those decisions will be announced and reflected as appropriate in the budget on the second Tuesday in May.