Senate debates
Monday, 10 October 2016
Questions without Notice
Attorney-General
2:12 pm
Doug Cameron (NSW, Australian Labor Party, Shadow Minister for Human Services) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
My question is to the Attorney-General, Senator Brandis. On 12 September when asked whether he stood by his assurance to the Senate that he had consulted the Solicitor-General on the Legal Services Amendment (Solicitor-General Opinions) Direction 2016, the Attorney-General said:
Yes, I do.
I again ask the Attorney-General: do you stand by this assurance?
George Brandis (Queensland, Liberal Party, Attorney-General) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
Senator Cameron, as I said to your colleague Senator Collins, the answer is, yes, I do. I have provided a detailed statement to the Senate Legal and Constitutional Affairs References Committee that explains why it is that that is my position.
Stephen Parry (President) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
Senator Cameron, a supplementary question.
2:13 pm
Doug Cameron (NSW, Australian Labor Party, Shadow Minister for Human Services) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
I refer to the Solicitor-General's evidence that he wrote to the Attorney-General on 11 May 2016 advising that he 'did not accept that the direction was the subject of prior consultation with me'. Why did the Attorney-General fail to reflect this position in his answer to the Senate some four months later?
George Brandis (Queensland, Liberal Party, Attorney-General) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
It is because I was asked whether I stood by a statement that I have made, and I do.
Stephen Parry (President) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
Senator Cameron, a final supplementary question.
Doug Cameron (NSW, Australian Labor Party, Shadow Minister for Human Services) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
Given that we know that the Solicitor-General wrote to the Attorney-General indicating he had not been consulted and the Solicitor-General has confirmed this in evidence to a Senate committee, why does the Attorney-General continue to deny that he has misled the Senate?
2:14 pm
George Brandis (Queensland, Liberal Party, Attorney-General) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
It is because, Senator Cameron, I have not done so. If you read the submission that I have provided to the Senate Legal and Constitutional Affairs References Committee you will see why it is that that is my position which I adhere to.