Senate debates

Wednesday, 9 August 2017

Committees

Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade Legislation Committee, Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade References Committee; Membership

9:31 am

Photo of Stephen ParryStephen Parry (President) Share this | | Hansard source

Order! Yesterday, the Deputy President informed the Senate that I had received letters from Senators Burston and Lambie seeking appointment to the Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade Legislation and References Committees. For the positions to be nominated by any minority group or independent senators, in accordance with standing orders, two ballots will be held to determine which one of the two senators is to be appointed to each committee.

Before proceeding to the ballots, the bells will be rung for four minutes. The ballots will be conducted consecutively, starting with a ballot for the legislation committee.

Photo of Ian MacdonaldIan Macdonald (Queensland, Liberal Party) Share this | | Hansard source

Mr President, on a point of order: I would like to seek an assurance from both nominees that they will attend these committees if they're appointed to them.

Photo of Stephen ParryStephen Parry (President) Share this | | Hansard source

That's not really a point of order, Senator Macdonald.

Photo of Ian MacdonaldIan Macdonald (Queensland, Liberal Party) Share this | | Hansard source

Is there a way of asking the question formally? I suspect we're not in session at the moment.

Photo of Stephen ParryStephen Parry (President) Share this | | Hansard source

The purpose of speaking whilst the bells are ringing, really, is to clarify points in relation to the division. The point you have made is probably not relevant to the division we are about to have. It's a matter for committees to determine attendance, and individual senators.

The bells having been rung—

Order! The bells have been rung for four minutes. We will now proceed to the ballot for the Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade Legislation Committee. Grey ballot papers will be distributed and you are asked to write on the paper the name of the candidate you wish to vote for, and I remind you the candidates are senators Burston and Lambie. I invite Senator Burston and Senator Lambie to act as scrutineers. Can I remind senators to remain in their seats during the entire process.

A ballot having been taken—

Order! The result of the ballot being Senator Burston, 29 votes, and Senator Lambie, 37 votes, Senator Lambie is elected. Unless any senator wishes for me to ring the bells again, I propose to move straight into the second ballot. No senator requests for the bells to be rung, so we will proceed to the ballot relating to the Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade References Committee. Pink ballot papers will be distributed. I indicate that the two candidates are again Senators Burston and Lambie. Senators, could I just propose this question: if any senator—and it is awkward because I don't want people to have to declare as it is a secret ballot—wanted to change their vote then we would proceed to a ballot. If senators wanted to keep the same vote they had in the first ballot then it would make no sense in having a second ballot. However, I am in the hands of senators as to whether you want to proceed to a ballot or not. Maybe if I just ask the question of the two leaders: do we wish to proceed to a ballot? The candidates?

Photo of Penny WongPenny Wong (SA, Australian Labor Party, Leader of the Opposition in the Senate) Share this | | Hansard source

It is a matter for the candidates if they wish to proceed to another ballot.

Photo of Stephen ParryStephen Parry (President) Share this | | Hansard source

There is ambiguity. We will conduct a ballot.

A ballot having been taken—

Has every senator voted? I will ask the Clerks to collect the ballot papers. Again, I invite the candidates Senators Burston and Lambie to come forward to act as scrutineers. There being 28 votes for Senator Burston and 36 votes for Senator Lambie, Senator Lambie again is elected to the position on the committee.