Senate debates
Monday, 17 September 2018
Questions without Notice
Aged Care
2:51 pm
Helen Polley (Tasmania, Australian Labor Party, Shadow Assistant Minister to the Leader (Tasmania)) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
My question is to the minister representing the Minister for Senior Australians and Aged Care, Senator Scullion. In an interview for the Four Corners program to be broadcast tonight, the minister said:
A royal commission, after two years and maybe $200 million being spent on it, will come back with the same set or a very similar set of recommendations …
When was the minister first advised of the change in the government's policy? Was it before or after his interview with Four Corners?
Nigel Scullion (NT, Country Liberal Party, Minister for Indigenous Affairs) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
The exact nature of the timing of that meeting I'm quite sure someone listening will provide me with. I understood that it was earlier in the week that the minister made a statement of a similar ilk. I didn't realise it was to Four CornersI'd read his comments about he'd much rather invest much of these funds that potentially could be for a royal commission into the sector. I think we'd all acknowledge that since then he's made another statement, but I think certainly most Australians would acknowledge that—
Nigel Scullion (NT, Country Liberal Party, Minister for Indigenous Affairs) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
Well, because there are some things that have come to light since then. The gigglers from the other side: it's a very serious matter. Some additional information has to come light that has shown—
Kim Carr (Victoria, Australian Labor Party, Shadow Minister for Innovation, Industry, Science and Research) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
Were you aware the Prime Minister had changed his mind? You read a poll.
Nigel Scullion (NT, Country Liberal Party, Minister for Indigenous Affairs) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
There is, quite clearly, some information that has come to light on the Four Corners report. There is some additional information that the minister has been looking at. He now has indicated in a statement, particularly after looking at the terms of reference, that he would support a royal commission. The reason he will support a royal commission is that, wherever we have our senior Australians, , whose care is not the best care we can offer, where the quality of that care is not the best care that we can provide—
Helen Polley (Tasmania, Australian Labor Party, Shadow Assistant Minister to the Leader (Tasmania)) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
A point of order on relevance—the question was: when was the minister advised of the change in the government's policy?
Scott Ryan (President) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
Thank you, Senator Polley. Senator Scullion, Senator Polley has reminded you of the specific nature of the question. Senator Scullion, you have 37 seconds remaining.
Nigel Scullion (NT, Country Liberal Party, Minister for Indigenous Affairs) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
On the point of order, Mr President—my indication was that she asked me whether or not the minister knew before or after the Four Corners report. I said I didn't know, and I said I will get back to you on notice. I was then proceeding with the remainder of the question, Mr President.
Scott Ryan (President) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
You are allowed to add information as long as the other information added is directly relevant to the question. The senator reminded you of that. You have 37 seconds remaining. Senator Scullion.
Nigel Scullion (NT, Country Liberal Party, Minister for Indigenous Affairs) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
Thank you very much. It is absolutely essential that we are able to ensure the quality and safety of our most treasured Australians. And so a royal commission will be able to outline a confidence for families, with relatives and with friends that we'll throw a light on it in so much as parliament—not government, but parliament—can provide those matters. And, can I say, it was pretty interesting about people being confused about their position. The quote 'I don't know if one is needed' on Tuesday was in fact from Bill Shorten.
Scott Ryan (President) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
Senator Polley, a supplementary question.
2:55 pm
Helen Polley (Tasmania, Australian Labor Party, Shadow Assistant Minister to the Leader (Tasmania)) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
Who made the decision to change the government's position and finally accept the need for a royal commission?
Nigel Scullion (NT, Country Liberal Party, Minister for Indigenous Affairs) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
We are a cabinet government, and the decision was made by cabinet. But I would indicate that I don't accept the premise of the question where the indications are that we somehow changed our position. We came to a conclusion when there was significant new material. We looked carefully at a number of reports of inquiries into this matter in addition to the material that was provided by Four Corners. The government considered that information, as they do, in the normal way, and we made a decision that this would be in the interests of senior Australians, and that's why we've moved on this matter. I don't think that should be a particular surprise. We are absolutely committed to ensuring that the most senior Australians have the very best care and the very best safety, and we have their very best interests at heart.
Scott Ryan (President) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
Senator Polley, a final supplementary question.
2:56 pm
Helen Polley (Tasmania, Australian Labor Party, Shadow Assistant Minister to the Leader (Tasmania)) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
Will the minister now apologise to older Australians, their families and their loved ones for dismissing warnings about the state of the aged-care sector and delaying real action to address this crisis?
Nigel Scullion (NT, Country Liberal Party, Minister for Indigenous Affairs) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
Senator Polley may have been confused when I was referring to Mr Shorten's statement, 'I don't know if one is needed', and I can't really apologise on his behalf, Mr President.
Scott Ryan (President) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
Senator Polley, on a point of order.
Helen Polley (Tasmania, Australian Labor Party, Shadow Assistant Minister to the Leader (Tasmania)) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
It’s a point of order on relevance. The light-hearted way that this minister has responded reflects the government's inaction on this issue.
Scott Ryan (President) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
Senator Polley, that is not a point of order on direct relevance. The minister's been speaking for 11 seconds. I am listening to his answer. He has 49 seconds remaining.
Nigel Scullion (NT, Country Liberal Party, Minister for Indigenous Affairs) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
Thank you for that, Mr President. Again, there seems to be a move towards partisanship on this most important issue. We will not get dragged into that sorry mess. We're about fixing something. We're about doing something that the previous government never did. We will not be dragged into politicising the outcomes. We are working to fix this. We have made significant investments. As I've indicated, we'll be making an investment of an additional $5 billion over the next five years. We've increased investment by $5 billion over the past five years. A $10 billion increase in investment in care and safety of our most treasured Australians is a great record from this government.