Tony Smith (Speaker) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source

I have received the following message from the Senate:

The Senate transmits to the House of Representatives the following resolution which was agreed to by the Senate this day:

That the Senate—

(a) notes that:

(i) the Senate passed the Australian Greens' National Integrity Commission Bill 2018 (No. 2) on 9 September 2019 to establish a federal corruption watchdog with broad remit to investigate allegations of corruption and misconduct, and to ensure strong, independent oversight of the actions of parliamentarians;

(ii) the National Integrity Commission Bill 2018 (No. 2) was sent to the House of Representatives for debate on 10 September 2019, but has yet to be debated;

(iii) on 10 February 2020, the Senate resolved to call on the House to vote on the National Integrity Commission Bill 2018 (No. 2);

(iv) the Government ignored this call and has prevented all attempts to debate and vote on the National Integrity Commission Bill 2018 (No. 2) in the House;

(v) public consultation on the Commonwealth Integrity Commission model proposed by the Government ended nearly eighteen months ago, but the Government has yet to introduce legislation to establish an integrity commission;

(vi) in May 2020, the Attorney-General said that legislation to establish a Commonwealth Integrity Commission would be further delayed due to the COVID-19 pandemic, despite an exposure draft being "ready for release"; and

(vii) polls consistently show that the majority of Australians support the establishment of a strong national integrity body; and

(b) calls on the Federal Government to bring on the National Integrity Commission Bill 2018 (No. 2) in the House for a vote in the June 2020 sittings. The Senate requests the concurrence of the House of Representatives in this resolution.

The Senate requests the concurrence of the House of Representatives in this resolution.

Christian Porter (Pearce, Liberal Party, Attorney-General) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source

I move:

That the message be considered at the next sitting.

Adam Bandt (Melbourne, Australian Greens) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source

I move:

That all words after 'That' be omitted with a view to substituting the following words: 'the message be considered immediately'.

Tony Smith (Speaker) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source

The Leader of the Greens will resume his seat.

Christian Porter (Pearce, Liberal Party, Attorney-General) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source

I move:

That the question be now put.

Tony Smith (Speaker) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source

The Leader of the Greens.

Adam Bandt (Melbourne, Australian Greens) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source

I was able to move the amendment—

Tony Smith (Speaker) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source

The Leader of the Greens will resume his seat. We've been over this a number of times. The question before the House is the question moved by the Leader of the House. You had moved an amendment. Until such time as it is has been moved, seconded and stated, it is not the question before the House. It's well documented in Practice; I'm very happy to give the Leader of the Greens a copy of the pages. The question is that the motion be put.

Tony Smith (Speaker) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source

The question now is that consideration of the message be made an order of the day for the next sitting.