Milton Dick (Speaker) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source

The question is that this bill now be read a second time. I'll put the question. Those of that opinion say aye—hang on. The member for Petrie, on a point of clarification.

Luke Howarth (Petrie, Liberal Party, Shadow Assistant Treasurer) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source

My understanding is: the Treasurer is speaking on omnibus amendment No.    1 next. Is that correct?

Milton Dick (Speaker) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source

We are dealing with the Future Made in Australia (Omnibus Amendments No. 1) Bill—

Luke Howarth (Petrie, Liberal Party, Shadow Assistant Treasurer) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source

We have questions after that, if he's speaking to it.

Milton Dick (Speaker) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source

Well, I'm just stating the question that the bill be now read a second time. If someone wishes to speak on the bill, under the standing orders they're able to do so.

Luke Howarth (Petrie, Liberal Party, Shadow Assistant Treasurer) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source

Now?

Milton Dick (Speaker) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source

Yes. For the benefit of the House, we're not in Consideration in Detail for this bill. The clerk has called on the bill, the next item which is listed in the 'blue'. We're finished with order No. 1. Now we're moving to order No. 2. It says, 'Resumption of debate on the second reading.' So we're technically in the second reading stage. If someone wishes in the House to debate the second reading, they're entitled to do that under the standing orders. If everyone's clear, I'll put the question—

If any member wishes to speak regarding the second reading debate, they're entitled to do so. I'll put the question—just to state the question for the House—that this bill be now read a second time. There being no-one indicating they wish to speak to the bill, I'll put the question to the House. The question before the House is that the bill be now read a second time.