Senate debates

Monday, 26 February 2024

Questions without Notice: Take Note of Answers

Oil and Gas Exploration

3:27 pm

Photo of Mehreen FaruqiMehreen Faruqi (NSW, Australian Greens) Share this | | Hansard source

I move:

That the Senate take note of the answer given by the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry (Senator Watt) to a question without notice asked by Senator Whish-Wilson today relating to Petroleum Exploration Permit 11 (PEP 11).

There is absolutely no case for drilling for dirty fossil fuels off the beautiful coastline of New South Wales. It will cause irreversible damage to our coast, our oceans and the wonderful marine life that lives within. It is a devastating prospect for our environment and climate, and it will hurt local industries and communities that depend on our oceans and coasts for their livelihoods. Yet today we heard more pathetic excuses for why the federal Labor government won't stop the climate-destroying PEP-11 project.

Let me remind you what Prime Minister Albanese promised in the lead-up to the last federal election: 'A Labor government that I lead will rule out PEP-11.' He also said that PEP-11 doesn't make sense 'from an economic, environmental or energy perspective.' In parliament he stood up and said that PEP-11 'should be consigned to the dustbin of history, where it belongs.' He said, 'This is a complete no-brainer.'

It doesn't happen often, but, on this, I could not agree more with the Prime Minister. What is the Prime Minister waiting for? In the middle of a climate crisis, there is no excuse to drill for offshore gas under PEP-11 when we know that burning gas will only make things worse. As we sit on the cusp of a climate catastrophe, why hasn't the Prime Minister finally rejected PEP-11 as he so emphatically promised before the election? Is this a promise he intends to keep, or has the fossil fuel lobby got to him again to approve yet another climate-destroying project?

PEP-11 opens up the door to dangerous projects and is universally opposed by communities from Newcastle and Lake Macquarie through to the Central Coast and from the northern beaches of Sydney to Manly. From the outset, the Greens and I have campaigned with courageous communities who have been united in their opposition to PEP-11, and I want to give Natasha Deen and Save Our Coast a particular shout-out for their work to protect our climate and oceans. PEP-11 must be rejected in its entirety—no ifs, no buts. Once and for all, reject PEP-11.

Question agreed to.

3:30 pm

Photo of Dorinda CoxDorinda Cox (WA, Australian Greens) Share this | | Hansard source

I move:

That the Senate take note of the answer given by the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry (Senator Watt) to a question without notice I asked today relating to environmental approvals.

I know that Minister Watt will say that the government reject this notion—the notion that I have put to them. This is the government's first legislative act since the referendum on a voice to parliament, yet they seek to continue to silence the voices of First Nations people in this place. Minister King's office have told me—as have DISR, the department under her direction—that the consultation is ongoing. It is ongoing, but they are not speaking to the right people. They have 200 names of native title groups, organisations, industry, environmental groups, but no names of the First Nations people who are challenging these offshore gas projects in the Federal Court—no Tipakalippa, no Burke, no Cooper. I asked the department directly in Senate estimates two weeks ago as this bill was coming on, because I knew that, of the eight technical amendments that this minister is hoping to put through, one of the major ones is about the EPBC. It's about environmental approvals and seeking to water down the approvals that are already there.

I reject Minister Watt's comments around this not being fast-tracking. In his words, putting them on the record, 'No. This is not about fast-tracking offshore gas projects.' It sure will be if this gets through—if it gets through the House and it gets through this place on a deal with the opposition about PRRT. And we know how broken that system is, because a teacher and a nurse pay more tax than the big gas cartel in this country. That's the deal that they will do with the opposition.

The FOI in Saturday's paper talks directly to and adds to the sea-dumping bill in the exposure that we had in this very chamber by Minister Wong: 'You've let IMPEX down. You've let Woodside down. You've let Santos down.' We've heard it all come out, and it continues. It continued in that FOI that was released. It was about Santos.

Question agreed to.